@article{a80af27c4f3846e0829cdc5fe54c9b93,
title = "Culture and technological innovation: Impact of institutional trust and appreciation of nature on attitudes towards food biotechnology in the USA and Germany",
abstract = "Using 'general trust in institutions' and 'concepts of nature' as examples, the article analyzes the influence of cultural factors on sense-making of food biotechnology and the resulting public attitudes in the USA and Germany. According to the hypotheses investigated, different levels of trust and appreciation of nature explain part of the well-known differences in attitudes between both countries. The analysis of a cross-cultural survey of the general population shows that appreciation of nature is a predictor of attitudes in both countries. The higher appreciation of nature in Germany partly explains why attitudes towards food biotechnology are more negative in Germany than in the USA. The relationship between trust and attitudes is more complex than expected, however. Institutional trust is a moderate predictor of attitudes towards food biotechnology in the USA but not in Germany. To explain the varying effectiveness of trust in resolving innovation-related uncertainty we refer to differences in issue framing in both countries and to the higher degree of universalism and individualism in the USA. We conclude that the higher relevance of trust and the lower appreciation of nature make the U.S. culture more apt to assimilate technical innovations than the German culture.",
author = "Peters, \{Hans Peter\} and Lang, \{John T.\} and Magdalena Sawicka and Hallman, \{William K.\}",
note = "Funding Information: The research described here was supported by a grant provided to the Rutgers Food Policy Institute by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), under the Initiative for the Future of Agricultural Food Systems (IFAFS) grant \#2002-52100-11203 {\textquoteleft}Evaluating Consumer Acceptance of Food Biotechnology in the United States{\textquoteright}, Dr William K. Hallman, Principal Investigator. It was conducted as part of a subcontract with the Research Center J{\"u}lich. The opinions expressed in the article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions or policies of the USDA, the Food Policy Institute, Rutgers University or the Research Center J{\"u}lich. The authors would like to thank several colleagues for their support in the preparation of this article. Cara Cuite and Helen Aquino were involved in the development of the survey questions, Paul Jansen helped with the statistical analysis, Susanna Priest, Allan Mazur, Martin Bauer and Arlena Jung provided relevant insights or commented on parts of an earlier version of the manuscript, and Evi Scholz and Markus Quandt made available the ISSP 2004 data on trust before the official release of the data set. Three anonymous reviewers made constructive comments that helped to sharpen our arguments. This article was first submitted to IJPOR on August , . The final version was received on December , .",
year = "2007",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1093/ijpor/edm004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "191--220",
journal = "International Journal of Public Opinion Research",
issn = "0954-2892",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",
}