Dearth by a Thousand Cuts? Accounting for Gender Differences in Top-Ranked Publication Rates in Social Psychology

Mina Cikara, Laurie Rudman, Susan Fiske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a flagship indicator of scientific prestige, shows dramatic gender disparities. A bibliometric analysis included yoked-control authors matched for PhD prestige and cohort. Though women publish less, at slower annual rates, they are more cited in handbooks and textbooks per JPSP-article-published. No gender differences emerged on variables reflecting differential qualifications. Many factors explain gender discrepancy in productivity. Among top publishers, per-year rate and first authorship especially differ by gender; rate uniquely predicts top-male productivity, whereas career-length uniquely predicts top-female productivity. Among men, across top-publishers and controls, productivity correlates uniquely with editorial negotiating and being married. For women, no personal variables predict productivity. A separate inquiry shows tiny gender differences in acceptance rates per JPSP article submitted; discrimination would be a small-but-plausible contributor, absent independent indicators of manuscript quality. Recent productivity rates mirror earlier gender disparities, suggesting gender gaps will continue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-285
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

social psychology
gender-specific factors
productivity
gender
prestige
personality psychology
qualification
textbook
discrimination
acceptance
career

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{0db1c36500604ad4a754557226abd5ac,
title = "Dearth by a Thousand Cuts?: Accounting for Gender Differences in Top-Ranked Publication Rates in Social Psychology",
abstract = "Publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a flagship indicator of scientific prestige, shows dramatic gender disparities. A bibliometric analysis included yoked-control authors matched for PhD prestige and cohort. Though women publish less, at slower annual rates, they are more cited in handbooks and textbooks per JPSP-article-published. No gender differences emerged on variables reflecting differential qualifications. Many factors explain gender discrepancy in productivity. Among top publishers, per-year rate and first authorship especially differ by gender; rate uniquely predicts top-male productivity, whereas career-length uniquely predicts top-female productivity. Among men, across top-publishers and controls, productivity correlates uniquely with editorial negotiating and being married. For women, no personal variables predict productivity. A separate inquiry shows tiny gender differences in acceptance rates per JPSP article submitted; discrimination would be a small-but-plausible contributor, absent independent indicators of manuscript quality. Recent productivity rates mirror earlier gender disparities, suggesting gender gaps will continue.",
author = "Mina Cikara and Laurie Rudman and Susan Fiske",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01748.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "263--285",
journal = "Journal of Social Issues",
issn = "0022-4537",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Dearth by a Thousand Cuts? Accounting for Gender Differences in Top-Ranked Publication Rates in Social Psychology. / Cikara, Mina; Rudman, Laurie; Fiske, Susan.

In: Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 68, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 263-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dearth by a Thousand Cuts?

T2 - Accounting for Gender Differences in Top-Ranked Publication Rates in Social Psychology

AU - Cikara, Mina

AU - Rudman, Laurie

AU - Fiske, Susan

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a flagship indicator of scientific prestige, shows dramatic gender disparities. A bibliometric analysis included yoked-control authors matched for PhD prestige and cohort. Though women publish less, at slower annual rates, they are more cited in handbooks and textbooks per JPSP-article-published. No gender differences emerged on variables reflecting differential qualifications. Many factors explain gender discrepancy in productivity. Among top publishers, per-year rate and first authorship especially differ by gender; rate uniquely predicts top-male productivity, whereas career-length uniquely predicts top-female productivity. Among men, across top-publishers and controls, productivity correlates uniquely with editorial negotiating and being married. For women, no personal variables predict productivity. A separate inquiry shows tiny gender differences in acceptance rates per JPSP article submitted; discrimination would be a small-but-plausible contributor, absent independent indicators of manuscript quality. Recent productivity rates mirror earlier gender disparities, suggesting gender gaps will continue.

AB - Publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a flagship indicator of scientific prestige, shows dramatic gender disparities. A bibliometric analysis included yoked-control authors matched for PhD prestige and cohort. Though women publish less, at slower annual rates, they are more cited in handbooks and textbooks per JPSP-article-published. No gender differences emerged on variables reflecting differential qualifications. Many factors explain gender discrepancy in productivity. Among top publishers, per-year rate and first authorship especially differ by gender; rate uniquely predicts top-male productivity, whereas career-length uniquely predicts top-female productivity. Among men, across top-publishers and controls, productivity correlates uniquely with editorial negotiating and being married. For women, no personal variables predict productivity. A separate inquiry shows tiny gender differences in acceptance rates per JPSP article submitted; discrimination would be a small-but-plausible contributor, absent independent indicators of manuscript quality. Recent productivity rates mirror earlier gender disparities, suggesting gender gaps will continue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862890906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862890906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01748.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01748.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862890906

VL - 68

SP - 263

EP - 285

JO - Journal of Social Issues

JF - Journal of Social Issues

SN - 0022-4537

IS - 2

ER -