Demographic Differences in Philosophical Intuition: a Reply to Joshua Knobe

Stephen P. Stich; Edouard Machery

doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00609-7

Demographic Differences in Philosophical Intuition: a Reply to Joshua Knobe

Stephen P. Stich
, Edouard Machery

School of Arts and Sciences, Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a recent paper, Joshua Knobe (2019) offers a startling account of the metaphilosophical implications of findings in experimental philosophy. We argue that Knobe’s account is seriously mistaken, and that it is based on a radically misleading portrait of recent work in experimental philosophy and cultural psychology.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	401-434
Number of pages	34
Journal	Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Volume	14
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00609-7
State	Published - Jun 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1007/s13164-021-00609-7

Cite this

@article{96a73008f77b48709578747bb5e0ec58,

title = "Demographic Differences in Philosophical Intuition: a Reply to Joshua Knobe",

abstract = "In a recent paper, Joshua Knobe (2019) offers a startling account of the metaphilosophical implications of findings in experimental philosophy. We argue that Knobe{\textquoteright}s account is seriously mistaken, and that it is based on a radically misleading portrait of recent work in experimental philosophy and cultural psychology.",

author = "Stich, \{Stephen P.\} and Edouard Machery",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.",

year = "2023",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1007/s13164-021-00609-7",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "14",

pages = "401--434",

journal = "Review of Philosophy and Psychology",

issn = "1878-5158",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Demographic Differences in Philosophical Intuition

T2 - a Reply to Joshua Knobe

AU - Stich, Stephen P.

AU - Machery, Edouard

PY - 2023/6

Y1 - 2023/6

N2 - In a recent paper, Joshua Knobe (2019) offers a startling account of the metaphilosophical implications of findings in experimental philosophy. We argue that Knobe’s account is seriously mistaken, and that it is based on a radically misleading portrait of recent work in experimental philosophy and cultural psychology.

AB - In a recent paper, Joshua Knobe (2019) offers a startling account of the metaphilosophical implications of findings in experimental philosophy. We argue that Knobe’s account is seriously mistaken, and that it is based on a radically misleading portrait of recent work in experimental philosophy and cultural psychology.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85123941616

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85123941616#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1007/s13164-021-00609-7

DO - 10.1007/s13164-021-00609-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85123941616

SN - 1878-5158

VL - 14

SP - 401

EP - 434

JO - Review of Philosophy and Psychology

JF - Review of Philosophy and Psychology

IS - 2

ER -

Demographic Differences in Philosophical Intuition: a Reply to Joshua Knobe

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this