Denationalisation, Assassination, Territory: Some (U.S.-Prompted) Reflections

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Unlike the several liberal states Macklin cites which have already, or will soon, deploy citizenship revocation as an anti-terrorism mechanism, the United States is unlikely to implement similar policies. The U.S. Constitution has been interpreted to prohibit unilateral citizenship-stripping as a tool of governance. Instead, denationalisation via expatriation in the U.S. requires the individual to specifically consent to relinquish the status, and such consent cannot be inferred from acts alone – even from acts which some (including some commentators in this symposium) would like to characterise as intrinsically antithetical to citizenship identity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationIMISCOE Research Series
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
Pages215-218
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Publication series

NameIMISCOE Research Series
ISSN (Print)2364-4087
ISSN (Electronic)2364-4095

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Denationalisation, Assassination, Territory: Some (U.S.-Prompted) Reflections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this