Development of Shock-Induced Analgesia: A Search for Hyperalgesia

Louis Matzel, Ralph R. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the use of parameters intended to maximize the potential to observe hyperalgesia, the possibility was examined that hyperalgesia might be the immediate response to aversive stimulation, whereas analgesia is delayed (Matzel & Miller, 1987). Consistent with the later prediction, analgesia in rats, as assessed by latency to paw lick in response to thermal stimulation, increased as a function of the delay between a tailshock (Experiment 1) or footshock (Experiment 3) and the test of pain sensitivity. However, in neither case was a hyperalgesic response observed at shock offset. In Experiment 2, the strength of the analgesic response was found to increase as a direct function of both the time since the tailshock and tailshock intensity over the limited ranges examined, but no hyperalgesia was observed immediately after either low- or highintensity shock. In Experiment 4, the opiate antagonist naloxone was found to attenuate both a weak immediate and stronger delayed analgesia, results suggesting a common underlying mechanism. This mitigates the likelihood that differential behavioral responses at short and long delays following shock were obscuring hyperalgesia at the time of shock offset or were summating with an analgesic response at the long delay to create the impression of enhanced analgesia. In total, these experiments provide evidence that opioid analgesia mediates a compensatory process that increases over time, but they provide no evidence that pain sensitivity increases above baseline levels immediately following an aversive event. These data are discussed in relation to preparatory models of endogenous analgesic functioning and the role of endogenous opioids in learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)850-856
Number of pages7
JournalBehavioral Neuroscience
Volume103
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hyperalgesia
Analgesia
Shock
Analgesics
Opioid Analgesics
Opiate Alkaloids
Pain
Naloxone
Hot Temperature
Learning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{04ba6283246d4d0f901222702b8899eb,
title = "Development of Shock-Induced Analgesia: A Search for Hyperalgesia",
abstract = "With the use of parameters intended to maximize the potential to observe hyperalgesia, the possibility was examined that hyperalgesia might be the immediate response to aversive stimulation, whereas analgesia is delayed (Matzel & Miller, 1987). Consistent with the later prediction, analgesia in rats, as assessed by latency to paw lick in response to thermal stimulation, increased as a function of the delay between a tailshock (Experiment 1) or footshock (Experiment 3) and the test of pain sensitivity. However, in neither case was a hyperalgesic response observed at shock offset. In Experiment 2, the strength of the analgesic response was found to increase as a direct function of both the time since the tailshock and tailshock intensity over the limited ranges examined, but no hyperalgesia was observed immediately after either low- or highintensity shock. In Experiment 4, the opiate antagonist naloxone was found to attenuate both a weak immediate and stronger delayed analgesia, results suggesting a common underlying mechanism. This mitigates the likelihood that differential behavioral responses at short and long delays following shock were obscuring hyperalgesia at the time of shock offset or were summating with an analgesic response at the long delay to create the impression of enhanced analgesia. In total, these experiments provide evidence that opioid analgesia mediates a compensatory process that increases over time, but they provide no evidence that pain sensitivity increases above baseline levels immediately following an aversive event. These data are discussed in relation to preparatory models of endogenous analgesic functioning and the role of endogenous opioids in learning.",
author = "Louis Matzel and Miller, {Ralph R.}",
year = "1989",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0735-7044.103.4.850",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "850--856",
journal = "Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0735-7044",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Development of Shock-Induced Analgesia : A Search for Hyperalgesia. / Matzel, Louis; Miller, Ralph R.

In: Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 103, No. 4, 01.08.1989, p. 850-856.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of Shock-Induced Analgesia

T2 - A Search for Hyperalgesia

AU - Matzel, Louis

AU - Miller, Ralph R.

PY - 1989/8/1

Y1 - 1989/8/1

N2 - With the use of parameters intended to maximize the potential to observe hyperalgesia, the possibility was examined that hyperalgesia might be the immediate response to aversive stimulation, whereas analgesia is delayed (Matzel & Miller, 1987). Consistent with the later prediction, analgesia in rats, as assessed by latency to paw lick in response to thermal stimulation, increased as a function of the delay between a tailshock (Experiment 1) or footshock (Experiment 3) and the test of pain sensitivity. However, in neither case was a hyperalgesic response observed at shock offset. In Experiment 2, the strength of the analgesic response was found to increase as a direct function of both the time since the tailshock and tailshock intensity over the limited ranges examined, but no hyperalgesia was observed immediately after either low- or highintensity shock. In Experiment 4, the opiate antagonist naloxone was found to attenuate both a weak immediate and stronger delayed analgesia, results suggesting a common underlying mechanism. This mitigates the likelihood that differential behavioral responses at short and long delays following shock were obscuring hyperalgesia at the time of shock offset or were summating with an analgesic response at the long delay to create the impression of enhanced analgesia. In total, these experiments provide evidence that opioid analgesia mediates a compensatory process that increases over time, but they provide no evidence that pain sensitivity increases above baseline levels immediately following an aversive event. These data are discussed in relation to preparatory models of endogenous analgesic functioning and the role of endogenous opioids in learning.

AB - With the use of parameters intended to maximize the potential to observe hyperalgesia, the possibility was examined that hyperalgesia might be the immediate response to aversive stimulation, whereas analgesia is delayed (Matzel & Miller, 1987). Consistent with the later prediction, analgesia in rats, as assessed by latency to paw lick in response to thermal stimulation, increased as a function of the delay between a tailshock (Experiment 1) or footshock (Experiment 3) and the test of pain sensitivity. However, in neither case was a hyperalgesic response observed at shock offset. In Experiment 2, the strength of the analgesic response was found to increase as a direct function of both the time since the tailshock and tailshock intensity over the limited ranges examined, but no hyperalgesia was observed immediately after either low- or highintensity shock. In Experiment 4, the opiate antagonist naloxone was found to attenuate both a weak immediate and stronger delayed analgesia, results suggesting a common underlying mechanism. This mitigates the likelihood that differential behavioral responses at short and long delays following shock were obscuring hyperalgesia at the time of shock offset or were summating with an analgesic response at the long delay to create the impression of enhanced analgesia. In total, these experiments provide evidence that opioid analgesia mediates a compensatory process that increases over time, but they provide no evidence that pain sensitivity increases above baseline levels immediately following an aversive event. These data are discussed in relation to preparatory models of endogenous analgesic functioning and the role of endogenous opioids in learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024436025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024436025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0735-7044.103.4.850

DO - 10.1037/0735-7044.103.4.850

M3 - Article

C2 - 2765188

AN - SCOPUS:0024436025

VL - 103

SP - 850

EP - 856

JO - Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0735-7044

IS - 4

ER -