TY - JOUR
T1 - “Did you suspect the post would be removed?”
T2 - Understanding user reactions to content removals on reddit
AU - Jhaver, Shagun
AU - Appling, Darren Scott
AU - Gilbert, Eric
AU - Bruckman, Amy
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to all our participants for being involved in this research. We would like to thank Benjamin Sugar, Josiah Mangiameli, Koustuv Saha, and Stevie Chancellor for their valuable inputs that improved this work. We also appreciate the AC and reviewers of this article for their constructive feedback and encouragement. Jhaver and Gilbert were supported by the National Science Foundation under grant IIS-1553376.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Thousands of users post on Reddit every day, but a fifth of all posts are removed [45]. How do users react to these removals? We conducted a survey of 907 Reddit users, asking them to reflect on their post removal a few hours after it happened. Examining the qualitative and quantitative responses from this survey, we present users’ perceptions of the platform’s moderation processes. We find that although roughly a fifth (18%) of the participants accepted that their post removal was appropriate, a majority of the participants did not — over a third (37%) of the participants did not understand why their post was removed, and further, 29% of the participants expressed some level of frustration about the removal. We focus on factors that shape users’ attitudes about fairness in moderation and posting again in the community. Our results indicate that users who read community guidelines or receive explanations for removal are more likely to perceive the removal as fair and post again in the future. We discuss implications for moderation practices and policies. Our findings suggest that the extra effort required to establish community guidelines and educate users with helpful feedback is worthwhile, leading to better user attitudes about fairness and propensity to post again.
AB - Thousands of users post on Reddit every day, but a fifth of all posts are removed [45]. How do users react to these removals? We conducted a survey of 907 Reddit users, asking them to reflect on their post removal a few hours after it happened. Examining the qualitative and quantitative responses from this survey, we present users’ perceptions of the platform’s moderation processes. We find that although roughly a fifth (18%) of the participants accepted that their post removal was appropriate, a majority of the participants did not — over a third (37%) of the participants did not understand why their post was removed, and further, 29% of the participants expressed some level of frustration about the removal. We focus on factors that shape users’ attitudes about fairness in moderation and posting again in the community. Our results indicate that users who read community guidelines or receive explanations for removal are more likely to perceive the removal as fair and post again in the future. We discuss implications for moderation practices and policies. Our findings suggest that the extra effort required to establish community guidelines and educate users with helpful feedback is worthwhile, leading to better user attitudes about fairness and propensity to post again.
KW - Content moderation
KW - Content regulation
KW - Removal explanations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069968186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069968186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3359294
DO - 10.1145/3359294
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85069968186
SN - 2573-0142
VL - 3
JO - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
JF - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
IS - CSCW
M1 - 192
ER -