TY - JOUR
T1 - Difference graphs
AU - Boros, Endre
AU - Gurvich, Vladimir
AU - Meshulam, Roy
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the partial support by the National Science Foundation (Grant IIS-0118635), the Office of Naval Research (Grants N00014-92-J-1375), and by DIMACS, the National Science Foundation Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science.
PY - 2004/2/6
Y1 - 2004/2/6
N2 - Intersection and measured intersection graphs are quite common in the literature. In this paper we introduce the analogous concept of measured difference graphs: Given an arbitrary hypergraph ℋ = {H 1,⋯,Hn}, let us associate to it a graph on vertex set [n] = {1,2,⋯,n} in which (i,j) is an edge iff the corresponding sets Hi and Hj are "sufficiently different". More precisely, given an integer threshold k, we consider three definitions, according to which (i,j) is an edge iff (1) |Hi|H j|+|Hj|Hi|≥2k, (2) max{|Hi|H j|,|Hj|Hi|} ≥ k, and (3) min{|H i|Hj|,|Hj|Hi|} ≥ k. It is not difficult to see that each of the above defines hereditary graph classes, which are monotone with respect to k. We show that for every graph G there exists a large enough k such that G arises with any of the definitions above. We prove that with the first two definitions one may need k = Ω(logn) in any such realizations of certain graphs on n vertices. However, we do not know a graph G which could not be realized by the last definition with k = 2.
AB - Intersection and measured intersection graphs are quite common in the literature. In this paper we introduce the analogous concept of measured difference graphs: Given an arbitrary hypergraph ℋ = {H 1,⋯,Hn}, let us associate to it a graph on vertex set [n] = {1,2,⋯,n} in which (i,j) is an edge iff the corresponding sets Hi and Hj are "sufficiently different". More precisely, given an integer threshold k, we consider three definitions, according to which (i,j) is an edge iff (1) |Hi|H j|+|Hj|Hi|≥2k, (2) max{|Hi|H j|,|Hj|Hi|} ≥ k, and (3) min{|H i|Hj|,|Hj|Hi|} ≥ k. It is not difficult to see that each of the above defines hereditary graph classes, which are monotone with respect to k. We show that for every graph G there exists a large enough k such that G arises with any of the definitions above. We prove that with the first two definitions one may need k = Ω(logn) in any such realizations of certain graphs on n vertices. However, we do not know a graph G which could not be realized by the last definition with k = 2.
KW - Difference graphs
KW - Graph realization
KW - Intersection graphs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346785313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346785313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0012-365X(03)00321-2
DO - 10.1016/S0012-365X(03)00321-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0346785313
SN - 0012-365X
VL - 276
SP - 59
EP - 64
JO - Discrete Mathematics
JF - Discrete Mathematics
IS - 1-3
ER -