Abstract
Archaeology and anthropology have a long-standing and often uneasy relationship. Anthropology, as the parent discipline, has provided the theoretical lens through which archaeological interpretation is viewed. However, archaeological methodology is unique and separate. Over the years, archaeology has been known at times to break away from anthropology with separate professional societies, separate university departments, and separate career tracks. Despite this, archaeology remains inextricably connected to anthropology. This chapter will discuss how and why archaeology and anthropology are distinct but complementary disciplines and how they have managed to coexist as such. Within the forensic community, forensic anthropology and archaeology in the United States have not been able yet to achieve this balance. The author will make the case for the philosophical foundations for forensic archaeology as separate from forensic anthropology specifically in the context of burial excavation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Forensic Archaeology |
| Subtitle of host publication | Multidisciplinary Perspectives |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 3-19 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783030032913 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783030032890 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Medicine
Keywords
- Clandestine graves key
- Crime scene
- Methodology
- Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Different But Equal: The Philosophical Foundations of Forensic Archaeology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver