TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential risk of increasing psychotropic polypharmacy use in children diagnosed with ADHD as preschoolers
AU - Winterstein, Almut G.
AU - Soria-Saucedo, Rene
AU - Gerhard, Tobias
AU - Correll, Christoph U.
AU - Olfson, Mark
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was partly received through the grant R01-HS0185606 from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Objective: To characterize treatment trajectories in children newly diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: We utilized billing records of children aged 3 to 18 years in 28 US states'f Medicaid programs between 1999 and 2006. Children entered the cohort at the first ADHD diagnosis (ICD-9-CM: 314.00) preceded by. 6 months with no psychotropic medication use and no psychiatric diagnoses. We followed children for 5 years to assess use of (1) psychotropic polypharmacy (the use of. 3 psychotropic medication classes), (2) antipsychotics, and (3) anticonvulsants. We used mixedeffects logistic regression to model the probability of each utilization outcome as a function of age at ADHD diagnosis and follow-up year, adjusted for sociodemographic factors. Results: Our cohort included 16,626 children of whom 79.2% received stimulants, 33.2% antidepressants, and 23.1% ¿-agonists, and 25.3% received psychotropic polypharmacy treatment at least once in a subsequent year. Antipsychotics (7.1%.14.7%), anticonvulsants (4.0%.7.9%), and psychotropic polypharmacy (8.5%.13.4%) use increased from year 1 to 5, but this increase was confined to children between ages 3 and 9 at ADHD diagnosis. Children diagnosed at age 3 had the most substantial increase in each outcome (OR = 1.80 [95% CI, 1.36.2.38]; 1.85 [1.38.2.47]; 2.14 [1.45.3.16]), respectively. Also, 39.1% of 9,680 children-years with psychotropic polypharmacy therapy had no psychiatric diagnoses other than ADHD. Conclusions: Psychotropic polypharmacy, antipsychotic, and anticonvulsant use increased with each year of follow-up. This effect was strongly mediated by the age of ADHD diagnosis with substantial increases in preschoolers but no corresponding effect in older children. It was only partially explained by physician diagnoses of concomitant mental disorders.
AB - Objective: To characterize treatment trajectories in children newly diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: We utilized billing records of children aged 3 to 18 years in 28 US states'f Medicaid programs between 1999 and 2006. Children entered the cohort at the first ADHD diagnosis (ICD-9-CM: 314.00) preceded by. 6 months with no psychotropic medication use and no psychiatric diagnoses. We followed children for 5 years to assess use of (1) psychotropic polypharmacy (the use of. 3 psychotropic medication classes), (2) antipsychotics, and (3) anticonvulsants. We used mixedeffects logistic regression to model the probability of each utilization outcome as a function of age at ADHD diagnosis and follow-up year, adjusted for sociodemographic factors. Results: Our cohort included 16,626 children of whom 79.2% received stimulants, 33.2% antidepressants, and 23.1% ¿-agonists, and 25.3% received psychotropic polypharmacy treatment at least once in a subsequent year. Antipsychotics (7.1%.14.7%), anticonvulsants (4.0%.7.9%), and psychotropic polypharmacy (8.5%.13.4%) use increased from year 1 to 5, but this increase was confined to children between ages 3 and 9 at ADHD diagnosis. Children diagnosed at age 3 had the most substantial increase in each outcome (OR = 1.80 [95% CI, 1.36.2.38]; 1.85 [1.38.2.47]; 2.14 [1.45.3.16]), respectively. Also, 39.1% of 9,680 children-years with psychotropic polypharmacy therapy had no psychiatric diagnoses other than ADHD. Conclusions: Psychotropic polypharmacy, antipsychotic, and anticonvulsant use increased with each year of follow-up. This effect was strongly mediated by the age of ADHD diagnosis with substantial increases in preschoolers but no corresponding effect in older children. It was only partially explained by physician diagnoses of concomitant mental disorders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028352895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028352895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4088/JCP.16m10884
DO - 10.4088/JCP.16m10884
M3 - Article
C2 - 28686819
AN - SCOPUS:85028352895
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 78
SP - e774-e781
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -