Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy

Christian Houle, Mark A. Kayser, Jun Xiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars, observing clustering in transitions to democracy, argue that democratization diffuses across borders as citizens in autocracies demand the same reforms they witness in neighboring states. We disagree. This article demonstrates that diffusion plays only a highly conditional role in democratization. We advance and test an alternative two-step theory of clustered democratization: (1) economic and international political shocks, which are clustered spatially and temporally, induce the breakdown of authoritarian regimes; then (2) democratic diffusion, in turn, influences whether a fallen dictatorship will be replaced by a democracy or a new autocracy. Diffusion, despite playing an important role, is insufficient to explain the clustering of transitions. Using data on 125 autocracies from 1875 to 2004, we show that economic crises trigger authoritarian breakdowns, while diffusion influences whether the new regime is democratic or authoritarian.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-726
Number of pages40
JournalInternational Organization
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

democracy
democratization
dictatorship
regime
economic crisis
witness
citizen
reform
Democracy
demand
economics
Democratization
Breakdown
Clustering
Autocracy
Trigger
Economic crisis
Economics
Dictatorship

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Law

Cite this

@article{764f91e56c4a4b7bb9c3e30f4f5da409,
title = "Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy",
abstract = "Scholars, observing clustering in transitions to democracy, argue that democratization diffuses across borders as citizens in autocracies demand the same reforms they witness in neighboring states. We disagree. This article demonstrates that diffusion plays only a highly conditional role in democratization. We advance and test an alternative two-step theory of clustered democratization: (1) economic and international political shocks, which are clustered spatially and temporally, induce the breakdown of authoritarian regimes; then (2) democratic diffusion, in turn, influences whether a fallen dictatorship will be replaced by a democracy or a new autocracy. Diffusion, despite playing an important role, is insufficient to explain the clustering of transitions. Using data on 125 autocracies from 1875 to 2004, we show that economic crises trigger authoritarian breakdowns, while diffusion influences whether the new regime is democratic or authoritarian.",
author = "Christian Houle and Kayser, {Mark A.} and Jun Xiang",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S002081831600028X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "687--726",
journal = "International Organization",
issn = "0020-8183",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy. / Houle, Christian; Kayser, Mark A.; Xiang, Jun.

In: International Organization, Vol. 70, No. 4, 01.01.2016, p. 687-726.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy

AU - Houle, Christian

AU - Kayser, Mark A.

AU - Xiang, Jun

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Scholars, observing clustering in transitions to democracy, argue that democratization diffuses across borders as citizens in autocracies demand the same reforms they witness in neighboring states. We disagree. This article demonstrates that diffusion plays only a highly conditional role in democratization. We advance and test an alternative two-step theory of clustered democratization: (1) economic and international political shocks, which are clustered spatially and temporally, induce the breakdown of authoritarian regimes; then (2) democratic diffusion, in turn, influences whether a fallen dictatorship will be replaced by a democracy or a new autocracy. Diffusion, despite playing an important role, is insufficient to explain the clustering of transitions. Using data on 125 autocracies from 1875 to 2004, we show that economic crises trigger authoritarian breakdowns, while diffusion influences whether the new regime is democratic or authoritarian.

AB - Scholars, observing clustering in transitions to democracy, argue that democratization diffuses across borders as citizens in autocracies demand the same reforms they witness in neighboring states. We disagree. This article demonstrates that diffusion plays only a highly conditional role in democratization. We advance and test an alternative two-step theory of clustered democratization: (1) economic and international political shocks, which are clustered spatially and temporally, induce the breakdown of authoritarian regimes; then (2) democratic diffusion, in turn, influences whether a fallen dictatorship will be replaced by a democracy or a new autocracy. Diffusion, despite playing an important role, is insufficient to explain the clustering of transitions. Using data on 125 autocracies from 1875 to 2004, we show that economic crises trigger authoritarian breakdowns, while diffusion influences whether the new regime is democratic or authoritarian.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000878963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85000878963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S002081831600028X

DO - 10.1017/S002081831600028X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85000878963

VL - 70

SP - 687

EP - 726

JO - International Organization

JF - International Organization

SN - 0020-8183

IS - 4

ER -