TY - JOUR
T1 - Distinct cutaneous bacterial assemblages in a sampling of South American Amerindians and US residents
AU - Blaser, Martin J.
AU - Dominguez-Bello, Maria G.
AU - Contreras, Monica
AU - Magris, Magda
AU - Hidalgo, Glida
AU - Estrada, Isidoro
AU - Gao, Zhan
AU - Clemente, Jose C.
AU - Costello, Elizabeth K.
AU - Knight, Rob
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Diane Belfer Program for Human Microbial Ecology, Biomedical Research Foundation of Colorado, SACAICET, Venezuela and by NIH grants HG004872, HG004866, DK090989 and UH2 AR057056 from the Human Microbiome Project, and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. We thank Donna Berg-Lyons for her technical assistance and Dr Huilin Li for her statistical support.
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - The human skin harbors complex bacterial communities. Prior studies showing high inter-individual variation focused on subjects from developed countries. We therefore compared cutaneous bacterial communities of Amerindians in the Venezuelan Amazon with subjects in the United States. Forearm skin specimens were studied from healthy Amerindians in Platanillal village in Amazonas State, and from healthy persons in New York and Colorado. All skin sampling used similar swab/buffer techniques. Multiplexed V2-targeted 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing yielded high quality sequences from 112 samples. The results show 20 phyla, with three (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria) predominating. US residents and Venezuelan Amerindians had significantly different forearm skin bacterial community compositions, with United States dominated by Propionibacterium. Among the Amerindians, there was a deep split based on bacterial community membership, with 30 and 42 samples, respectively, falling into each of the two groups, not associated with age, gender, or body mass index. One Amerindian group had diversity similar to the United States, but was dominated by Staphylococcus rather than Propionibacterium. The other Amerindian group was significantly more diverse and even than the US or the other Amerindian group, and featured a broad range of Proteobacteria. The results provide evidence that ethnicity, lifestyle and/or geography are associated with the structure of human cutaneous bacterial communities.
AB - The human skin harbors complex bacterial communities. Prior studies showing high inter-individual variation focused on subjects from developed countries. We therefore compared cutaneous bacterial communities of Amerindians in the Venezuelan Amazon with subjects in the United States. Forearm skin specimens were studied from healthy Amerindians in Platanillal village in Amazonas State, and from healthy persons in New York and Colorado. All skin sampling used similar swab/buffer techniques. Multiplexed V2-targeted 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing yielded high quality sequences from 112 samples. The results show 20 phyla, with three (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria) predominating. US residents and Venezuelan Amerindians had significantly different forearm skin bacterial community compositions, with United States dominated by Propionibacterium. Among the Amerindians, there was a deep split based on bacterial community membership, with 30 and 42 samples, respectively, falling into each of the two groups, not associated with age, gender, or body mass index. One Amerindian group had diversity similar to the United States, but was dominated by Staphylococcus rather than Propionibacterium. The other Amerindian group was significantly more diverse and even than the US or the other Amerindian group, and featured a broad range of Proteobacteria. The results provide evidence that ethnicity, lifestyle and/or geography are associated with the structure of human cutaneous bacterial communities.
KW - cutaneous
KW - genetics
KW - human
KW - microbial diversity
KW - microbiome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871367444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871367444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/ismej.2012.81
DO - 10.1038/ismej.2012.81
M3 - Article
C2 - 22895161
AN - SCOPUS:84871367444
SN - 1751-7362
VL - 7
SP - 85
EP - 95
JO - ISME Journal
JF - ISME Journal
IS - 1
ER -