TY - JOUR
T1 - DNA Testing for Family Reunification and the Limits of Biological Truth
AU - Lee, Catherine
AU - Voigt, Torsten H.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Ann Morning, Barbara Prainsack, and Wendy Roth for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers, Edward Hackett, and Katie Vann for instructive criticism. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Catherine Lee acknowledges support from the Russell Sage Foundation. Torsten H. Voigt acknowledges funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2013) under REA grant agreement 625814 and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number 01GP0903).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - As nation-states make greater efforts to regulate the flow of people on the move—refugees, economic migrants, and international travelers alike—advocates of DNA profiling technologies claim DNA testing provides a reliable and objective way of revealing a person’s true identity for immigration procedures. This article examines the use of DNA testing for family reunification in immigration cases in Finland, Germany, and the United States—the first transatlantic analysis of such cases—to explore the relationship between technology, the meaning of family, and immigration. Drawing on our analyses of archival records, government documents, and interviews with immigration stakeholders, we argue that DNA testing is not conclusive about the meaning of family. While the technology may facilitate decision making for both would-be immigrants and state officials, our study shows hesitancy among the latter to let DNA testing make the final determination. We introduce the concept of social validity—whether the interpretation of test results matches social or political meanings in a given local context—in order to make sense of the complexities and challenges of DNA testing in practice. We show that DNA testing is not just a technology of belonging or a way to claim citizenship rights. It may also enable exclusion and denial of rights.
AB - As nation-states make greater efforts to regulate the flow of people on the move—refugees, economic migrants, and international travelers alike—advocates of DNA profiling technologies claim DNA testing provides a reliable and objective way of revealing a person’s true identity for immigration procedures. This article examines the use of DNA testing for family reunification in immigration cases in Finland, Germany, and the United States—the first transatlantic analysis of such cases—to explore the relationship between technology, the meaning of family, and immigration. Drawing on our analyses of archival records, government documents, and interviews with immigration stakeholders, we argue that DNA testing is not conclusive about the meaning of family. While the technology may facilitate decision making for both would-be immigrants and state officials, our study shows hesitancy among the latter to let DNA testing make the final determination. We introduce the concept of social validity—whether the interpretation of test results matches social or political meanings in a given local context—in order to make sense of the complexities and challenges of DNA testing in practice. We show that DNA testing is not just a technology of belonging or a way to claim citizenship rights. It may also enable exclusion and denial of rights.
KW - DNA testing
KW - biological citizenship
KW - biotechnology
KW - family reunification
KW - immigration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070285079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070285079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0162243919862870
DO - 10.1177/0162243919862870
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070285079
SN - 0162-2439
VL - 45
SP - 430
EP - 454
JO - Science Technology and Human Values
JF - Science Technology and Human Values
IS - 3
ER -