Do the SEC's enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct?

Simi Kedia, Shiva Rajgopal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

176 Scopus citations


Recent frauds have questioned the efficacy of the SEC's enforcement program. We hypothesize that differences in firms' information sets about SEC enforcement and constraints facing the SEC affect firms' proclivity to adopt aggressive accounting practices. We find that firms located closer to the SEC and in areas with greater past SEC enforcement activity, both proxies for firms' information about SEC enforcement, are less likely to restate their financial statements. Consistent with the resource-constrained SEC view, the SEC is more likely to investigate firms located closer to its offices. Our results suggest that regulation is most effective when it is local.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-278
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Accounting and Economics
Issue number3
StatePublished - Apr 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics


  • Distance
  • Enforcement
  • Information asymmetry
  • Restatement
  • SEC


Dive into the research topics of 'Do the SEC's enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this