Does cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety outperform usual care in community clinics? An initial effectiveness test

Michael A. Southam-Gerow, John R. Weisz, Brian Chu, Bryce D. McLeod, Elana B. Gordis, Jennifer K. Connor-Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Most tests of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders have shown beneficial effects, but these have been efficacy trials with recruited youths treated by researcher-employed therapists. One previous (nonrandomized) trial in community clinics found that CBT did not outperform usual care (UC). The present study used a more stringent effectiveness design to test CBT versus UC in youths referred to community clinics, with all treatment provided by therapists employed in the clinics. Method: A randomized controlled trial methodology was used. Therapists were randomized to training and supervision in the Coping Cat CBT program or UC. Forty-eight youths (56% girls, 8 to 15 years of age, 38% Caucasian, 33% Latino, 15% African-American) diagnosed with DSM-IV anxiety disorders were randomized to CBT or UC. Results: At the end of treatment more than half the youths no longer met criteria for their primary anxiety disorder, but the groups did not differ significantly on symptom (e.g., parent report, eta-square = 0.0001; child report, eta-square = 0.09; both differences favoring UC) or diagnostic (CBT, 66.7% without primary diagnosis; UC, 73.7%; odds ratio 0.71) outcomes. No differences were found with regard to outcomes of comorbid conditions, treatment duration, or costs. However, youths receiving CBT used fewer additional services than UC youths (χ21 = 8.82, p = .006). Conclusions: CBT did not produce better clinical outcomes than usual community clinic care. This initial test involved a relatively modest sample size; more research is needed to clarify whether there are conditions under which CBT can produce better clinical outcomes than usual clinical care. Clinical trial registry informationCommunity Clinic Test of Youth Anxiety and Depression Study, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT01005836.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1043-1052
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume49
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Anxiety
Anxiety Disorders
Hispanic Americans
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
African Americans
Sample Size
Registries
Cats
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Odds Ratio
Research Personnel
Clinical Trials
Depression
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Keywords

  • child and adolescent anxiety disorders
  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • effectiveness research

Cite this

Southam-Gerow, Michael A. ; Weisz, John R. ; Chu, Brian ; McLeod, Bryce D. ; Gordis, Elana B. ; Connor-Smith, Jennifer K. / Does cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety outperform usual care in community clinics? An initial effectiveness test. In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2010 ; Vol. 49, No. 10. pp. 1043-1052.
@article{83140b238ab049ac9f8ce955515255b7,
title = "Does cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety outperform usual care in community clinics? An initial effectiveness test",
abstract = "Objective: Most tests of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders have shown beneficial effects, but these have been efficacy trials with recruited youths treated by researcher-employed therapists. One previous (nonrandomized) trial in community clinics found that CBT did not outperform usual care (UC). The present study used a more stringent effectiveness design to test CBT versus UC in youths referred to community clinics, with all treatment provided by therapists employed in the clinics. Method: A randomized controlled trial methodology was used. Therapists were randomized to training and supervision in the Coping Cat CBT program or UC. Forty-eight youths (56{\%} girls, 8 to 15 years of age, 38{\%} Caucasian, 33{\%} Latino, 15{\%} African-American) diagnosed with DSM-IV anxiety disorders were randomized to CBT or UC. Results: At the end of treatment more than half the youths no longer met criteria for their primary anxiety disorder, but the groups did not differ significantly on symptom (e.g., parent report, eta-square = 0.0001; child report, eta-square = 0.09; both differences favoring UC) or diagnostic (CBT, 66.7{\%} without primary diagnosis; UC, 73.7{\%}; odds ratio 0.71) outcomes. No differences were found with regard to outcomes of comorbid conditions, treatment duration, or costs. However, youths receiving CBT used fewer additional services than UC youths (χ21 = 8.82, p = .006). Conclusions: CBT did not produce better clinical outcomes than usual community clinic care. This initial test involved a relatively modest sample size; more research is needed to clarify whether there are conditions under which CBT can produce better clinical outcomes than usual clinical care. Clinical trial registry informationCommunity Clinic Test of Youth Anxiety and Depression Study, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT01005836.",
keywords = "child and adolescent anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, effectiveness research",
author = "Southam-Gerow, {Michael A.} and Weisz, {John R.} and Brian Chu and McLeod, {Bryce D.} and Gordis, {Elana B.} and Connor-Smith, {Jennifer K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1043--1052",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

Does cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety outperform usual care in community clinics? An initial effectiveness test. / Southam-Gerow, Michael A.; Weisz, John R.; Chu, Brian; McLeod, Bryce D.; Gordis, Elana B.; Connor-Smith, Jennifer K.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 49, No. 10, 01.10.2010, p. 1043-1052.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety outperform usual care in community clinics? An initial effectiveness test

AU - Southam-Gerow, Michael A.

AU - Weisz, John R.

AU - Chu, Brian

AU - McLeod, Bryce D.

AU - Gordis, Elana B.

AU - Connor-Smith, Jennifer K.

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - Objective: Most tests of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders have shown beneficial effects, but these have been efficacy trials with recruited youths treated by researcher-employed therapists. One previous (nonrandomized) trial in community clinics found that CBT did not outperform usual care (UC). The present study used a more stringent effectiveness design to test CBT versus UC in youths referred to community clinics, with all treatment provided by therapists employed in the clinics. Method: A randomized controlled trial methodology was used. Therapists were randomized to training and supervision in the Coping Cat CBT program or UC. Forty-eight youths (56% girls, 8 to 15 years of age, 38% Caucasian, 33% Latino, 15% African-American) diagnosed with DSM-IV anxiety disorders were randomized to CBT or UC. Results: At the end of treatment more than half the youths no longer met criteria for their primary anxiety disorder, but the groups did not differ significantly on symptom (e.g., parent report, eta-square = 0.0001; child report, eta-square = 0.09; both differences favoring UC) or diagnostic (CBT, 66.7% without primary diagnosis; UC, 73.7%; odds ratio 0.71) outcomes. No differences were found with regard to outcomes of comorbid conditions, treatment duration, or costs. However, youths receiving CBT used fewer additional services than UC youths (χ21 = 8.82, p = .006). Conclusions: CBT did not produce better clinical outcomes than usual community clinic care. This initial test involved a relatively modest sample size; more research is needed to clarify whether there are conditions under which CBT can produce better clinical outcomes than usual clinical care. Clinical trial registry informationCommunity Clinic Test of Youth Anxiety and Depression Study, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT01005836.

AB - Objective: Most tests of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders have shown beneficial effects, but these have been efficacy trials with recruited youths treated by researcher-employed therapists. One previous (nonrandomized) trial in community clinics found that CBT did not outperform usual care (UC). The present study used a more stringent effectiveness design to test CBT versus UC in youths referred to community clinics, with all treatment provided by therapists employed in the clinics. Method: A randomized controlled trial methodology was used. Therapists were randomized to training and supervision in the Coping Cat CBT program or UC. Forty-eight youths (56% girls, 8 to 15 years of age, 38% Caucasian, 33% Latino, 15% African-American) diagnosed with DSM-IV anxiety disorders were randomized to CBT or UC. Results: At the end of treatment more than half the youths no longer met criteria for their primary anxiety disorder, but the groups did not differ significantly on symptom (e.g., parent report, eta-square = 0.0001; child report, eta-square = 0.09; both differences favoring UC) or diagnostic (CBT, 66.7% without primary diagnosis; UC, 73.7%; odds ratio 0.71) outcomes. No differences were found with regard to outcomes of comorbid conditions, treatment duration, or costs. However, youths receiving CBT used fewer additional services than UC youths (χ21 = 8.82, p = .006). Conclusions: CBT did not produce better clinical outcomes than usual community clinic care. This initial test involved a relatively modest sample size; more research is needed to clarify whether there are conditions under which CBT can produce better clinical outcomes than usual clinical care. Clinical trial registry informationCommunity Clinic Test of Youth Anxiety and Depression Study, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT01005836.

KW - child and adolescent anxiety disorders

KW - cognitive behavioral therapy

KW - effectiveness research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956966098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956966098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 20855049

AN - SCOPUS:77956966098

VL - 49

SP - 1043

EP - 1052

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 10

ER -