Does physician performance explain interspecialty differences in malpractice claim rates?

Mark I. Taragin, Frank Sonnenberg, M. Elizabeth Karns, Richard Trout, Sharona Shapiro, Jeffrey Carson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Physician specialty has been consistently associated with different malpractice claim rates, with neurosurgery, orthopedics, and obstetrics and gynecology having the highest rates. Whether these differences reflect physician performance or other aspects of patient care that are unique for each specialty is unclear. A retrospective cohort study was performed including 12,829 physicians involved in 8,221 closed cases from 1977 to 1991. For each case an assessment was made whether the plaintiff received an award and whether the physician care of the patient was indefensible. An award was made to the plaintiff in 42% of cases. Physician care was considered indefensible in 23% of the cases. The specialties with the highest award rates were anesthesiology (58.3%), obstetrics and gynecology (47.5%), and radiology (43.0%). Neurosurgery had the lowest rate of award (30.2%). The specialties with the highest indefensibility rates were radiology (36%), obstetrics and gynecology (27%), and anesthesiology (27%). Neurosurgery had the lowest indefensibility rate (10%). These results were unchanged after controlling for physician age, degree, site of training, certification status, and severity of patient injury. In conclusion, differences in award rate and indefensibility are present, but not large enough to explain the large variation in specialty claim rates. This suggests that the variation in malpractice rates results from factors other than a meaningful difference in physician performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)661-667
Number of pages7
JournalMedical care
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Physicians
Neurosurgery
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Anesthesiology
Radiology
Patient Care
Certification
Orthopedics
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Keywords

  • Health services research
  • Malpractice
  • Peer review
  • Risk management

Cite this

Taragin, Mark I. ; Sonnenberg, Frank ; Karns, M. Elizabeth ; Trout, Richard ; Shapiro, Sharona ; Carson, Jeffrey. / Does physician performance explain interspecialty differences in malpractice claim rates?. In: Medical care. 1994 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 661-667.
@article{db1a46889d984d409918932340766e73,
title = "Does physician performance explain interspecialty differences in malpractice claim rates?",
abstract = "Physician specialty has been consistently associated with different malpractice claim rates, with neurosurgery, orthopedics, and obstetrics and gynecology having the highest rates. Whether these differences reflect physician performance or other aspects of patient care that are unique for each specialty is unclear. A retrospective cohort study was performed including 12,829 physicians involved in 8,221 closed cases from 1977 to 1991. For each case an assessment was made whether the plaintiff received an award and whether the physician care of the patient was indefensible. An award was made to the plaintiff in 42{\%} of cases. Physician care was considered indefensible in 23{\%} of the cases. The specialties with the highest award rates were anesthesiology (58.3{\%}), obstetrics and gynecology (47.5{\%}), and radiology (43.0{\%}). Neurosurgery had the lowest rate of award (30.2{\%}). The specialties with the highest indefensibility rates were radiology (36{\%}), obstetrics and gynecology (27{\%}), and anesthesiology (27{\%}). Neurosurgery had the lowest indefensibility rate (10{\%}). These results were unchanged after controlling for physician age, degree, site of training, certification status, and severity of patient injury. In conclusion, differences in award rate and indefensibility are present, but not large enough to explain the large variation in specialty claim rates. This suggests that the variation in malpractice rates results from factors other than a meaningful difference in physician performance.",
keywords = "Health services research, Malpractice, Peer review, Risk management",
author = "Taragin, {Mark I.} and Frank Sonnenberg and Karns, {M. Elizabeth} and Richard Trout and Sharona Shapiro and Jeffrey Carson",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005650-199407000-00001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "661--667",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

Does physician performance explain interspecialty differences in malpractice claim rates? / Taragin, Mark I.; Sonnenberg, Frank; Karns, M. Elizabeth; Trout, Richard; Shapiro, Sharona; Carson, Jeffrey.

In: Medical care, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.01.1994, p. 661-667.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does physician performance explain interspecialty differences in malpractice claim rates?

AU - Taragin, Mark I.

AU - Sonnenberg, Frank

AU - Karns, M. Elizabeth

AU - Trout, Richard

AU - Shapiro, Sharona

AU - Carson, Jeffrey

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Physician specialty has been consistently associated with different malpractice claim rates, with neurosurgery, orthopedics, and obstetrics and gynecology having the highest rates. Whether these differences reflect physician performance or other aspects of patient care that are unique for each specialty is unclear. A retrospective cohort study was performed including 12,829 physicians involved in 8,221 closed cases from 1977 to 1991. For each case an assessment was made whether the plaintiff received an award and whether the physician care of the patient was indefensible. An award was made to the plaintiff in 42% of cases. Physician care was considered indefensible in 23% of the cases. The specialties with the highest award rates were anesthesiology (58.3%), obstetrics and gynecology (47.5%), and radiology (43.0%). Neurosurgery had the lowest rate of award (30.2%). The specialties with the highest indefensibility rates were radiology (36%), obstetrics and gynecology (27%), and anesthesiology (27%). Neurosurgery had the lowest indefensibility rate (10%). These results were unchanged after controlling for physician age, degree, site of training, certification status, and severity of patient injury. In conclusion, differences in award rate and indefensibility are present, but not large enough to explain the large variation in specialty claim rates. This suggests that the variation in malpractice rates results from factors other than a meaningful difference in physician performance.

AB - Physician specialty has been consistently associated with different malpractice claim rates, with neurosurgery, orthopedics, and obstetrics and gynecology having the highest rates. Whether these differences reflect physician performance or other aspects of patient care that are unique for each specialty is unclear. A retrospective cohort study was performed including 12,829 physicians involved in 8,221 closed cases from 1977 to 1991. For each case an assessment was made whether the plaintiff received an award and whether the physician care of the patient was indefensible. An award was made to the plaintiff in 42% of cases. Physician care was considered indefensible in 23% of the cases. The specialties with the highest award rates were anesthesiology (58.3%), obstetrics and gynecology (47.5%), and radiology (43.0%). Neurosurgery had the lowest rate of award (30.2%). The specialties with the highest indefensibility rates were radiology (36%), obstetrics and gynecology (27%), and anesthesiology (27%). Neurosurgery had the lowest indefensibility rate (10%). These results were unchanged after controlling for physician age, degree, site of training, certification status, and severity of patient injury. In conclusion, differences in award rate and indefensibility are present, but not large enough to explain the large variation in specialty claim rates. This suggests that the variation in malpractice rates results from factors other than a meaningful difference in physician performance.

KW - Health services research

KW - Malpractice

KW - Peer review

KW - Risk management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028469879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028469879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00001

DO - 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00001

M3 - Article

C2 - 8028402

AN - SCOPUS:0028469879

VL - 32

SP - 661

EP - 667

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 7

ER -