Drugs and racial constructions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose - In this chapter, I examine how racial disparities in punishment for nonviolent drug crimes align with significant differences in how the black and white drug problems are constructed in media, law enforcement, and academia. Methodology/approach - By examining differences in how the black and white drug problems have been constructed over the past 70 years for the opioids (heroin, prescription painkillers), cocaine (both powder and crack), and marijuana, I illustrate how these distinct representations of the black and white drug problems accompany more punitive policies in response to black drug epidemics even as white drug epidemics are typically met with tolerance or indifference. Findings - Historically, powerful interest groups like media and law enforcement have benefitted from circulating myths and exaggerations about the illegal drug problem that encourage punitive drug policies. By contrast, at least some academics have benefitted from taking the opposite tack and debunking many of these myths. Unfortunately, academics have been less willing to challenge myths about the black drug problem than the white drug problem. Indeed, some academics actually reinforce many of the myths about the black drug problem promoted by media and law enforcement. Originality/value - This chapter builds upon a substantial academic literature that challenges myths about illegal drug use by whites. However, it goes beyond this literature to consider the paucity of similar academic research exposing media and law enforcement myths about the black drug problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-268
Number of pages18
JournalSociology of Crime Law and Deviance
Volume22
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

drug problem
drug
myth
law enforcement
media law
drug policy
communication research
interest group
tolerance
drug use
penalty
medication
offense
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Keywords

  • Crack epidemic
  • Ethnographic research
  • Prescription painkiller epidemic
  • Racial constructions
  • War on drugs

Cite this

@article{3fba664248ad4405ac8f095317c375c8,
title = "Drugs and racial constructions",
abstract = "Purpose - In this chapter, I examine how racial disparities in punishment for nonviolent drug crimes align with significant differences in how the black and white drug problems are constructed in media, law enforcement, and academia. Methodology/approach - By examining differences in how the black and white drug problems have been constructed over the past 70 years for the opioids (heroin, prescription painkillers), cocaine (both powder and crack), and marijuana, I illustrate how these distinct representations of the black and white drug problems accompany more punitive policies in response to black drug epidemics even as white drug epidemics are typically met with tolerance or indifference. Findings - Historically, powerful interest groups like media and law enforcement have benefitted from circulating myths and exaggerations about the illegal drug problem that encourage punitive drug policies. By contrast, at least some academics have benefitted from taking the opposite tack and debunking many of these myths. Unfortunately, academics have been less willing to challenge myths about the black drug problem than the white drug problem. Indeed, some academics actually reinforce many of the myths about the black drug problem promoted by media and law enforcement. Originality/value - This chapter builds upon a substantial academic literature that challenges myths about illegal drug use by whites. However, it goes beyond this literature to consider the paucity of similar academic research exposing media and law enforcement myths about the black drug problem.",
keywords = "Crack epidemic, Ethnographic research, Prescription painkiller epidemic, Racial constructions, War on drugs",
author = "Jeanette Covington",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S1521-613620170000022019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "251--268",
journal = "Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance",
issn = "1521-6136",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

Drugs and racial constructions. / Covington, Jeanette.

In: Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance, Vol. 22, 01.01.2017, p. 251-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drugs and racial constructions

AU - Covington, Jeanette

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose - In this chapter, I examine how racial disparities in punishment for nonviolent drug crimes align with significant differences in how the black and white drug problems are constructed in media, law enforcement, and academia. Methodology/approach - By examining differences in how the black and white drug problems have been constructed over the past 70 years for the opioids (heroin, prescription painkillers), cocaine (both powder and crack), and marijuana, I illustrate how these distinct representations of the black and white drug problems accompany more punitive policies in response to black drug epidemics even as white drug epidemics are typically met with tolerance or indifference. Findings - Historically, powerful interest groups like media and law enforcement have benefitted from circulating myths and exaggerations about the illegal drug problem that encourage punitive drug policies. By contrast, at least some academics have benefitted from taking the opposite tack and debunking many of these myths. Unfortunately, academics have been less willing to challenge myths about the black drug problem than the white drug problem. Indeed, some academics actually reinforce many of the myths about the black drug problem promoted by media and law enforcement. Originality/value - This chapter builds upon a substantial academic literature that challenges myths about illegal drug use by whites. However, it goes beyond this literature to consider the paucity of similar academic research exposing media and law enforcement myths about the black drug problem.

AB - Purpose - In this chapter, I examine how racial disparities in punishment for nonviolent drug crimes align with significant differences in how the black and white drug problems are constructed in media, law enforcement, and academia. Methodology/approach - By examining differences in how the black and white drug problems have been constructed over the past 70 years for the opioids (heroin, prescription painkillers), cocaine (both powder and crack), and marijuana, I illustrate how these distinct representations of the black and white drug problems accompany more punitive policies in response to black drug epidemics even as white drug epidemics are typically met with tolerance or indifference. Findings - Historically, powerful interest groups like media and law enforcement have benefitted from circulating myths and exaggerations about the illegal drug problem that encourage punitive drug policies. By contrast, at least some academics have benefitted from taking the opposite tack and debunking many of these myths. Unfortunately, academics have been less willing to challenge myths about the black drug problem than the white drug problem. Indeed, some academics actually reinforce many of the myths about the black drug problem promoted by media and law enforcement. Originality/value - This chapter builds upon a substantial academic literature that challenges myths about illegal drug use by whites. However, it goes beyond this literature to consider the paucity of similar academic research exposing media and law enforcement myths about the black drug problem.

KW - Crack epidemic

KW - Ethnographic research

KW - Prescription painkiller epidemic

KW - Racial constructions

KW - War on drugs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019683272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019683272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1521-613620170000022019

DO - 10.1108/S1521-613620170000022019

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 251

EP - 268

JO - Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance

JF - Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance

SN - 1521-6136

ER -