Dyadic Effects, Relevance, and the Empirical Assessment of the Kantian Peace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Dyadic effects to a large extent account for the difficulty of explaining and predicting international conflict. In this study, I derive a statistical model to estimate unobserved dyadic effects in the dyadic analysis of conflict. The proposed model employs a hierarchical modeling approach to estimate dyadic effects, thereby avoiding the problems caused by the use of fixed effects models. Furthermore, it simultaneously addresses the important sample selection issue of identifying relevant dyads. I show that the estimation of dyadic effects significantly improves the model fit and generates several interesting findings. Substantively, this study makes an important contribution to the empirical evaluation of the Kantian peace. It argues that international organizations increase the likelihood of conflict of interest between member states but reduce the probability of militarized conflict. I demonstrate that the positive coefficient of international organizations in Oneal and Russett (1999) is biased in the positive direction. When the proposed statistical model is used, international organizations, together with trade and democracy, reduce the probability of conflict.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-271
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Interactions
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2017

Fingerprint

peace
International Organizations
international conflict
conflict of interest
dyad
democracy
evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Keywords

  • Dyadic effects
  • Kantian peace
  • hierarchical model
  • international organizations
  • relevance
  • split population model

Cite this

@article{96b7e8e5dfc0452da13bbaaa9b5c24cf,
title = "Dyadic Effects, Relevance, and the Empirical Assessment of the Kantian Peace",
abstract = "Dyadic effects to a large extent account for the difficulty of explaining and predicting international conflict. In this study, I derive a statistical model to estimate unobserved dyadic effects in the dyadic analysis of conflict. The proposed model employs a hierarchical modeling approach to estimate dyadic effects, thereby avoiding the problems caused by the use of fixed effects models. Furthermore, it simultaneously addresses the important sample selection issue of identifying relevant dyads. I show that the estimation of dyadic effects significantly improves the model fit and generates several interesting findings. Substantively, this study makes an important contribution to the empirical evaluation of the Kantian peace. It argues that international organizations increase the likelihood of conflict of interest between member states but reduce the probability of militarized conflict. I demonstrate that the positive coefficient of international organizations in Oneal and Russett (1999) is biased in the positive direction. When the proposed statistical model is used, international organizations, together with trade and democracy, reduce the probability of conflict.",
keywords = "Dyadic effects, Kantian peace, hierarchical model, international organizations, relevance, split population model",
author = "Jun Xiang",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/03050629.2016.1156542",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "248--271",
journal = "International Interactions",
issn = "0305-0629",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Dyadic Effects, Relevance, and the Empirical Assessment of the Kantian Peace. / Xiang, Jun.

In: International Interactions, Vol. 43, No. 2, 04.03.2017, p. 248-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dyadic Effects, Relevance, and the Empirical Assessment of the Kantian Peace

AU - Xiang, Jun

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - Dyadic effects to a large extent account for the difficulty of explaining and predicting international conflict. In this study, I derive a statistical model to estimate unobserved dyadic effects in the dyadic analysis of conflict. The proposed model employs a hierarchical modeling approach to estimate dyadic effects, thereby avoiding the problems caused by the use of fixed effects models. Furthermore, it simultaneously addresses the important sample selection issue of identifying relevant dyads. I show that the estimation of dyadic effects significantly improves the model fit and generates several interesting findings. Substantively, this study makes an important contribution to the empirical evaluation of the Kantian peace. It argues that international organizations increase the likelihood of conflict of interest between member states but reduce the probability of militarized conflict. I demonstrate that the positive coefficient of international organizations in Oneal and Russett (1999) is biased in the positive direction. When the proposed statistical model is used, international organizations, together with trade and democracy, reduce the probability of conflict.

AB - Dyadic effects to a large extent account for the difficulty of explaining and predicting international conflict. In this study, I derive a statistical model to estimate unobserved dyadic effects in the dyadic analysis of conflict. The proposed model employs a hierarchical modeling approach to estimate dyadic effects, thereby avoiding the problems caused by the use of fixed effects models. Furthermore, it simultaneously addresses the important sample selection issue of identifying relevant dyads. I show that the estimation of dyadic effects significantly improves the model fit and generates several interesting findings. Substantively, this study makes an important contribution to the empirical evaluation of the Kantian peace. It argues that international organizations increase the likelihood of conflict of interest between member states but reduce the probability of militarized conflict. I demonstrate that the positive coefficient of international organizations in Oneal and Russett (1999) is biased in the positive direction. When the proposed statistical model is used, international organizations, together with trade and democracy, reduce the probability of conflict.

KW - Dyadic effects

KW - Kantian peace

KW - hierarchical model

KW - international organizations

KW - relevance

KW - split population model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973902449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973902449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03050629.2016.1156542

DO - 10.1080/03050629.2016.1156542

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973902449

VL - 43

SP - 248

EP - 271

JO - International Interactions

JF - International Interactions

SN - 0305-0629

IS - 2

ER -