Early triple-negative breast cancer in women aged ≥65: Retrospective study of outcomes, resource use and costs, 2010-2016

Jan Sieluk, Amin Haiderali, Min Huang, Lingfeng Yang, Kim M. Hirshfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: To examine real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients & methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we identified patients (≥65 years) with newly diagnosed stage II/III TNBC in 2010-2015 who had surgery plus neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant (systemic and/or radiation) therapy. Treatment, survival, healthcare resource use and costs were assessed through 2016. Results: Of 1569 patients (>99% women), 6%/74%/20% received neoadjuvant-only/adjuvant-only/both (neo + adj) therapies, respectively. Median overall survival was 23 months/not reached (NR)/78 months, with longer survival at stage II (NR/NR/78 months) than stage III (22/43/38 months). Mean per patient per month costs were $10,620 and $17,872 in neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods. Conclusion: These findings provide insights into clinical and economic outcomes for early-stage TNBC in 2010-2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1039-1054
Number of pages16
JournalFuture Oncology
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Keywords

  • costs
  • early-stage
  • observational
  • retrospective study
  • survival
  • treatment patterns
  • triple-negative breast cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early triple-negative breast cancer in women aged ≥65: Retrospective study of outcomes, resource use and costs, 2010-2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this