TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of simulated cataract on the accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting diabetic retinopathy in color fundus photos
AU - Crane, Alexander B.
AU - Choudhry, Hassaam S.
AU - Dastjerdi, Mohammad H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) is often trained on images without ocular co-morbidities, limiting its generalizability. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a convolutional neural network (CNN) applied to color fundus photos (CFPs) with simulated cataracts (SCs) in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: A database of 3662 CFPs (from Asia Pacific Tele-Ophthalmology Society (APTOS) 2019) was used. Using transfer learning, a CNN was trained to classify the training images as either DR or non-DR. The CNN was then applied to classify the testing images after an SC was applied, using varying degrees of Gaussian blur. Results: Accuracy without SC was 97.0%, sensitivity (Sn) 95.7%, specificity (Sp) 98.3%. For mild SC, accuracy was 93.1%, Sn 91.8%, Sp 94.3%. For moderate SC, accuracy was 62.8%, Sn 31.4%, Sp 95.2%. For severe SC, accuracy was 53.5%, Sn 11.8%, Sp 96.5%. Conclusion: SCs significantly impaired AI accuracy. To prepare AI for clinical use, cataracts and other real-world clinical challenges affecting image quality must be accounted for.
AB - Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) is often trained on images without ocular co-morbidities, limiting its generalizability. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a convolutional neural network (CNN) applied to color fundus photos (CFPs) with simulated cataracts (SCs) in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: A database of 3662 CFPs (from Asia Pacific Tele-Ophthalmology Society (APTOS) 2019) was used. Using transfer learning, a CNN was trained to classify the training images as either DR or non-DR. The CNN was then applied to classify the testing images after an SC was applied, using varying degrees of Gaussian blur. Results: Accuracy without SC was 97.0%, sensitivity (Sn) 95.7%, specificity (Sp) 98.3%. For mild SC, accuracy was 93.1%, Sn 91.8%, Sp 94.3%. For moderate SC, accuracy was 62.8%, Sn 31.4%, Sp 95.2%. For severe SC, accuracy was 53.5%, Sn 11.8%, Sp 96.5%. Conclusion: SCs significantly impaired AI accuracy. To prepare AI for clinical use, cataracts and other real-world clinical challenges affecting image quality must be accounted for.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - cataracts
KW - diabetic retinopathy
KW - fundus photography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181178757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181178757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1163_23
DO - 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1163_23
M3 - Article
C2 - 38131541
AN - SCOPUS:85181178757
SN - 0301-4738
VL - 72
SP - S42-S45
JO - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
ER -