Effects of Cooperative and Individual Rewriting on an Instruction Writing Task

Angela M. O'donnell; Donald F. Dansereau; Thomas R. Rocklin; Celia O. Larson; Velma I. Hythecker; Michael D. Young; Judith G. Lambiotte

doi:10.1177/0741088387004001005

Effects of Cooperative and Individual Rewriting on an Instruction Writing Task

Angela M. O'donnell, Donald F. Dansereau, Thomas R. Rocklin, Celia O. Larson, Velma I. Hythecker, Michael D. Young, Judith G. Lambiotte

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The performance of students who rewrote an experimenter-provided set of instructions in dyads or individually was compared with that of individuals who wrote without access to those instructions. A total of 49 students participated in the experiment. The rewriting groups were provided with sample instructions and were asked to improve them; the writing group simply wrote instructions. All students then wrote a second set of instructions individually. The results showed that on the first task both the dyadic rewriting group and the individual writing group significantly outperformed the individual rewriting group on a communication score. Significant differences were also found on the completeness score. The ordering of means on this measure from highest to lowest was individual rewriters, dyadic rewriters, and the writing individuals.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	90-99
Number of pages	10
Journal	Written Communication
Volume	4
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088387004001005
State	Published - Jan 1987
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Communication
Literature and Literary Theory

Access to Document

10.1177/0741088387004001005

Cite this

@article{4de406c663ca4d7f8fc433e7e96a8031,

title = "Effects of Cooperative and Individual Rewriting on an Instruction Writing Task",

abstract = "The performance of students who rewrote an experimenter-provided set of instructions in dyads or individually was compared with that of individuals who wrote without access to those instructions. A total of 49 students participated in the experiment. The rewriting groups were provided with sample instructions and were asked to improve them; the writing group simply wrote instructions. All students then wrote a second set of instructions individually. The results showed that on the first task both the dyadic rewriting group and the individual writing group significantly outperformed the individual rewriting group on a communication score. Significant differences were also found on the completeness score. The ordering of means on this measure from highest to lowest was individual rewriters, dyadic rewriters, and the writing individuals.",

author = "O'donnell, {Angela M.} and Dansereau, {Donald F.} and Rocklin, {Thomas R.} and Larson, {Celia O.} and Hythecker, {Velma I.} and Young, {Michael D.} and Lambiotte, {Judith G.}",

year = "1987",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1177/0741088387004001005",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "90--99",

journal = "Written Communication",

issn = "0741-0883",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Cooperative and Individual Rewriting on an Instruction Writing Task

AU - O'donnell, Angela M.

AU - Dansereau, Donald F.

AU - Rocklin, Thomas R.

AU - Larson, Celia O.

AU - Hythecker, Velma I.

AU - Young, Michael D.

AU - Lambiotte, Judith G.

PY - 1987/1

Y1 - 1987/1

N2 - The performance of students who rewrote an experimenter-provided set of instructions in dyads or individually was compared with that of individuals who wrote without access to those instructions. A total of 49 students participated in the experiment. The rewriting groups were provided with sample instructions and were asked to improve them; the writing group simply wrote instructions. All students then wrote a second set of instructions individually. The results showed that on the first task both the dyadic rewriting group and the individual writing group significantly outperformed the individual rewriting group on a communication score. Significant differences were also found on the completeness score. The ordering of means on this measure from highest to lowest was individual rewriters, dyadic rewriters, and the writing individuals.

AB - The performance of students who rewrote an experimenter-provided set of instructions in dyads or individually was compared with that of individuals who wrote without access to those instructions. A total of 49 students participated in the experiment. The rewriting groups were provided with sample instructions and were asked to improve them; the writing group simply wrote instructions. All students then wrote a second set of instructions individually. The results showed that on the first task both the dyadic rewriting group and the individual writing group significantly outperformed the individual rewriting group on a communication score. Significant differences were also found on the completeness score. The ordering of means on this measure from highest to lowest was individual rewriters, dyadic rewriters, and the writing individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948327387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948327387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0741088387004001005

DO - 10.1177/0741088387004001005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84948327387

SN - 0741-0883

VL - 4

SP - 90

EP - 99

JO - Written Communication

JF - Written Communication

IS - 1

ER -

Effects of Cooperative and Individual Rewriting on an Instruction Writing Task

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this