TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of lead on learning in herring gulls
T2 - An avian wildlife model for neurobehavioral deficits
AU - Burger, Joanna
AU - Gochfeld, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP) through the Department of Energy cooperative agreement (AI # DE-FC01-95EW55084), by NIEHS (ESO 5022), and the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute. We thank B. Friedlander, B.D. Goldstein, and C. Powers for providing valuable comments on the research or manuscript, C. Dixon, T. Shukla, S. Shukla, and M. McMahon for laboratory assistance, and R. Ramos for graphics. Permits to collect wild birds for laboratory study were issued by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, and the N.Y. Department of Environmental Conservation. These experiments were performed under an approved Rutgers University protocol.
PY - 2005/8
Y1 - 2005/8
N2 - Lead is one of the most common metals in contaminated ecosystems. Although lead poisoning and mortality have long been known, little is known of the neurobehavioral effects produced by low levels of lead in wild animals. Herein we describe the neurobehavioral effects of lead on learning using herring gulls (Larus argentatus) as a model. Doses used in these studies conducted in the laboratory and in nature were sufficient to produce lead concentrations in feathers that were equivalent to those found in gulls living in the wild. The exposure consisted of a single intraperitoneal injection of 0 and 100 mg/kg lead acetate on day 2; each experiment involved 20-30 chicks in a lead-exposed group, and 20-30 chicks in a control group. We examined walking, begging, feeding, behavioral thermoregulation, individual recognition, and treadmill learning. There were significant differences between control and lead-exposed gulls chicks on all testing days. Learning, as well as improvement of motor skills, was faster for control chicks than lead-injected chicks for the thermoregulatory test, individual recognition, and behavior on a treadmill. Lead-injected chicks improved faster than control chicks only for walking scores. In a test where chicks were shown food under a cup, and then tested with three overturned cups, lead-exposed chicks did not show much improvement, whereas control chicks quickly learned where the food was located. The greatest differences in improvement were on the behavioral thermoregulation test, where lead-exposed chicks showed no improvement with age. Overall, this series of experiments indicated that for tasks involving learning, the disparity in accuracy and ability remained regardless of the number of days since exposure - control chicks sometimes improved and learned quicker than did lead-exposed chicks.
AB - Lead is one of the most common metals in contaminated ecosystems. Although lead poisoning and mortality have long been known, little is known of the neurobehavioral effects produced by low levels of lead in wild animals. Herein we describe the neurobehavioral effects of lead on learning using herring gulls (Larus argentatus) as a model. Doses used in these studies conducted in the laboratory and in nature were sufficient to produce lead concentrations in feathers that were equivalent to those found in gulls living in the wild. The exposure consisted of a single intraperitoneal injection of 0 and 100 mg/kg lead acetate on day 2; each experiment involved 20-30 chicks in a lead-exposed group, and 20-30 chicks in a control group. We examined walking, begging, feeding, behavioral thermoregulation, individual recognition, and treadmill learning. There were significant differences between control and lead-exposed gulls chicks on all testing days. Learning, as well as improvement of motor skills, was faster for control chicks than lead-injected chicks for the thermoregulatory test, individual recognition, and behavior on a treadmill. Lead-injected chicks improved faster than control chicks only for walking scores. In a test where chicks were shown food under a cup, and then tested with three overturned cups, lead-exposed chicks did not show much improvement, whereas control chicks quickly learned where the food was located. The greatest differences in improvement were on the behavioral thermoregulation test, where lead-exposed chicks showed no improvement with age. Overall, this series of experiments indicated that for tasks involving learning, the disparity in accuracy and ability remained regardless of the number of days since exposure - control chicks sometimes improved and learned quicker than did lead-exposed chicks.
KW - Behavior
KW - Cognitive development
KW - Developmental exposure
KW - Herring gulls
KW - Individual recognition
KW - Lead
KW - Learning
KW - Wildlife bioindicators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844450048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844450048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuro.2005.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.neuro.2005.01.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 15941590
AN - SCOPUS:23844450048
SN - 0161-813X
VL - 26
SP - 615
EP - 624
JO - Neurotoxicology
JF - Neurotoxicology
IS - 4 SPEC. ISS.
ER -