TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of lead on sibling recognition in young herring gulls
AU - Burger, Joanna
N1 - Funding Information:
M. Gochfeld made insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. This research was aided by a number of assistants who helped care for the gulls and aided in data analysis and graphics, and I thank them now: T. Benson, J. Ondrof, R. Ramos, and M. McMahon, as well as a number of undergraduate research assistants. I thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the New York Department of Conservation, and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for permits to collect the gulls. This research was approved by the University Animal Review Board and was funded by the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP) through the Department of Energy (AI No. DE-FC01-95EW55084) and NIEHS (ESO 5022).
PY - 1998/6
Y1 - 1998/6
N2 - Lead exposure early in life affects physiology, behavior, and cognitive development in humans and other animals. In gulls, lead also disrupts parental recognition, leading to potential decreases in survival in wild populations. In this paper, young herring gulls, Larus argentatus, were used to examine the effect of lead on sibling recognition. Each of 80 one-day-old herring gull chicks was randomly assigned to either a control group or a lead treatment group that received a single dose of lead acetate solution (100 mg/kg) at day 2. Matched controls were injected with isotonic saline at the same age. At 10 days of age, there was no demonstrable sibling recognition in control chicks, but recognition was clearly developed by 15 days of age. Lead disrupted sibling recognition, and there still was no evidence of sibling recognition in lead-injected chicks by 26 days of age. Time to respond initially increased and then decreased with age in both control and lead- injected chicks. Control chicks that correctly reached their siblings did so in significantly less time than did lead-injected chicks, and they remained closer to their siblings at the end of the test. These experiments clearly demonstrate that lead disrupts sibling recognition in herring gull chicks, delays the time to respond and to reach their siblings, and increases the final distance chicks are from their calling siblings. In nature, lead- impaired chicks would be unable to use siblings as a cue enabling them to find their nests and might suffer higher mortality from territorial adults and chicks, as well as from cannibalistic adults.
AB - Lead exposure early in life affects physiology, behavior, and cognitive development in humans and other animals. In gulls, lead also disrupts parental recognition, leading to potential decreases in survival in wild populations. In this paper, young herring gulls, Larus argentatus, were used to examine the effect of lead on sibling recognition. Each of 80 one-day-old herring gull chicks was randomly assigned to either a control group or a lead treatment group that received a single dose of lead acetate solution (100 mg/kg) at day 2. Matched controls were injected with isotonic saline at the same age. At 10 days of age, there was no demonstrable sibling recognition in control chicks, but recognition was clearly developed by 15 days of age. Lead disrupted sibling recognition, and there still was no evidence of sibling recognition in lead-injected chicks by 26 days of age. Time to respond initially increased and then decreased with age in both control and lead- injected chicks. Control chicks that correctly reached their siblings did so in significantly less time than did lead-injected chicks, and they remained closer to their siblings at the end of the test. These experiments clearly demonstrate that lead disrupts sibling recognition in herring gull chicks, delays the time to respond and to reach their siblings, and increases the final distance chicks are from their calling siblings. In nature, lead- impaired chicks would be unable to use siblings as a cue enabling them to find their nests and might suffer higher mortality from territorial adults and chicks, as well as from cannibalistic adults.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0031927715
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0031927715#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1006/toxs.1998.2451
DO - 10.1006/toxs.1998.2451
M3 - Article
C2 - 9710957
AN - SCOPUS:0031927715
SN - 1096-6080
VL - 43
SP - 155
EP - 160
JO - Toxicological Sciences
JF - Toxicological Sciences
IS - 2
ER -