Abstract
Identifying the bases for self-assessed health (SAH) has interested researchers in their attempts to understand its validity as a predictor of future health outcomes. Quantitative approaches typically used statistical methods to identify correlates of SAH while qualitative approaches asked people to elaborate on the reasons underlying their rating of health. The current study used a quantitative methodology, asking 487 elderly people to rate the importance of 42 health-related factors as bases for their SAH judgment. Factors indicating overall functioning/vitality were rated highly by all participants. Factors indicating current disease were rated highly by people reporting poor/fair SAH while risk factors and positive indicators were rated highly by those reporting good, very good, or excellent health. Thus, there seems to be a clear distinction between poor and fair SAH that reflect levels of illness, and higher levels of SAH that reflect levels of health.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1661-1667 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Social Science and Medicine |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2003 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health(social science)
- History and Philosophy of Science
Keywords
- Elderly
- Self-rated health
- Subjective health