Emergency department use: a reflection of poor primary care access?

Daniel Weisz, Michael K. Gusmano, Grace Wong, John Trombley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations


STUDY DESIGN: Using a survey of ED patients, insurance claims data, and administrative records identifying demographic factors, we analyzed the use of the ED in an impoverished area of Brooklyn, New York.

METHODS: We examined original survey data to investigate the extent to which residents of northern and central Brooklyn use EDs for nonemergencies and whether these patients have access to PCPs. We used data from health insurers operating in northern and central Brooklyn, and New York state hospital ED visit data to investigate the factors influencing ED visits for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs). Logistic regression was used to identify characteristics that predict ED visits not resulting in admission for ACSCs.

RESULTS: Of 11,546 patients that completed our survey, the presenting complaint was self-described as emergent by 57%, 30% had no PCP, and 19% reported no health insurance coverage. Using health insurance plan encounter data, only 15 % of patients had seen any provider within 1 week of the ED visit. Insurance type, age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status of area of residence influence the likelihood of these ED visits.

CONCLUSIONS: Correlating data from 3 sources, we suggest that the expansion of insurance under the Affordable Care Act may not be sufficient to reduce ED use for nonurgent conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the use of the emergency department (ED) for nonurgent care reflects poor access to community-based primary care providers (PCPs).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e152-e160
JournalThe American journal of managed care
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency department use: a reflection of poor primary care access?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this