Emulating co-channel interference in wireless networks using equivalent low-tap filters

Shweta Sagari, Larry Greenstein, Wade Trappe

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

In emulating a multi-node wireless network, received interference can be represented by combining the multipath responses of the interfering links. Each multipath response can be described by a set of mean-squared amplitude of the multipath components and relative delays. The number of filter taps required per link to emulate the actual ('true') channel is a function of the channel bandwidth W and RMS delay spread Trms. Assuming each per-link channel to have an exponentially decaying power delay profile, this value is about 4WTrms. We propose to emulate each link using n uniformly-spaced taps of equal mean-square gain. For this case, the required number of taps is only 2WTrms, while maintaining the important characteristic (i.e., the CDF of total power, taken over the fading) of the true channel. We derive this result analytically and confirm it by simulation. Improving on this 50% reduction in required taps, we further show that the loss in accuracy is significantly low so long as the total number of taps is the order of 16 or more. For large values of WTrms, this can lead to even more reduction in n and, thus, further limit the cost and complexity of emulators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Event2014 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2014 - Princeton, NJ, United States
Duration: Mar 19 2014Mar 21 2014

Other

Other2014 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2014
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPrinceton, NJ
Period3/19/143/21/14

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems

Keywords

  • hardware emulators
  • multi-node wireless networks
  • radio interference
  • tapped-delay-line channels

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emulating co-channel interference in wireless networks using equivalent low-tap filters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this