Environmental Impact Statements: Some Annoying Questions

Michael R. Greenberg, Robert M. Hordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) may prove to be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it may be of great importance in managing the environment by providing a stimulus to organized, multi-disciplinary research. On the other hand, NEPA opens the door to decisions made with misplaced concreteness and, more importantly, to the false justification of decisions motivated by political concerns and bureaucratic vested interests. The adequacy of the theoretical, data bank, and mathematical underpinnings of the impact studies, and the institutional responses to using and to evaluating the projected environmental impacts are analyzed in the context of the Suburban Action Institute proposal to construct moderate and low income housing in Mahwah, New Jersey.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-175
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Planning Association
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1974

Fingerprint

Environmental Policy Act
environmental policy
environmental impact
low income housing
data bank
stimulus
low income
housing
environmental impact statement
decision

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

@article{3ce069f1803049feaac0ded3cc6b932d,
title = "Environmental Impact Statements: Some Annoying Questions",
abstract = "The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) may prove to be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it may be of great importance in managing the environment by providing a stimulus to organized, multi-disciplinary research. On the other hand, NEPA opens the door to decisions made with misplaced concreteness and, more importantly, to the false justification of decisions motivated by political concerns and bureaucratic vested interests. The adequacy of the theoretical, data bank, and mathematical underpinnings of the impact studies, and the institutional responses to using and to evaluating the projected environmental impacts are analyzed in the context of the Suburban Action Institute proposal to construct moderate and low income housing in Mahwah, New Jersey.",
author = "Greenberg, {Michael R.} and Hordon, {Robert M.}",
year = "1974",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/01944367408977466",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "164--175",
journal = "Journal of the American Planning Association",
issn = "0194-4363",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Environmental Impact Statements : Some Annoying Questions. / Greenberg, Michael R.; Hordon, Robert M.

In: Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 40, No. 3, 05.1974, p. 164-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental Impact Statements

T2 - Some Annoying Questions

AU - Greenberg, Michael R.

AU - Hordon, Robert M.

PY - 1974/5

Y1 - 1974/5

N2 - The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) may prove to be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it may be of great importance in managing the environment by providing a stimulus to organized, multi-disciplinary research. On the other hand, NEPA opens the door to decisions made with misplaced concreteness and, more importantly, to the false justification of decisions motivated by political concerns and bureaucratic vested interests. The adequacy of the theoretical, data bank, and mathematical underpinnings of the impact studies, and the institutional responses to using and to evaluating the projected environmental impacts are analyzed in the context of the Suburban Action Institute proposal to construct moderate and low income housing in Mahwah, New Jersey.

AB - The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) may prove to be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it may be of great importance in managing the environment by providing a stimulus to organized, multi-disciplinary research. On the other hand, NEPA opens the door to decisions made with misplaced concreteness and, more importantly, to the false justification of decisions motivated by political concerns and bureaucratic vested interests. The adequacy of the theoretical, data bank, and mathematical underpinnings of the impact studies, and the institutional responses to using and to evaluating the projected environmental impacts are analyzed in the context of the Suburban Action Institute proposal to construct moderate and low income housing in Mahwah, New Jersey.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945764161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945764161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01944367408977466

DO - 10.1080/01944367408977466

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945764161

VL - 40

SP - 164

EP - 175

JO - Journal of the American Planning Association

JF - Journal of the American Planning Association

SN - 0194-4363

IS - 3

ER -