Environmental Impact Statements: Some Annoying Questions

Michael R. Greenberg, Robert M. Hordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) may prove to be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it may be of great importance in managing the environment by providing a stimulus to organized, multi-disciplinary research. On the other hand, NEPA opens the door to decisions made with misplaced concreteness and, more importantly, to the false justification of decisions motivated by political concerns and bureaucratic vested interests. The adequacy of the theoretical, data bank, and mathematical underpinnings of the impact studies, and the institutional responses to using and to evaluating the projected environmental impacts are analyzed in the context of the Suburban Action Institute proposal to construct moderate and low income housing in Mahwah, New Jersey.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-175
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Planning Association
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1974

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental Impact Statements: Some Annoying Questions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this