Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: Incidence of stroke in Japan and Hawaii

Yo Takeya, Jordan S. Popper, Yukiko Shimizu, Hiroo Kato, George G. Rhoads, Abraham Kagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

135 Scopus citations

Abstract

As part of the Ni-Hon-San Study, stroke incidence was compared in the Japan and Hawaii cohorts. Stroke cases were classified in two types, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and thrombo-embolic stroke (T-E). For each type the incidence in Japan was about three times as great as in Hawaii. The ratio ICH/T-E was 1/2.2 and 1/1.6 in Japan and Hawaii, respectively. Blood pressure was the most important risk factor, followed by age for total stroke in both Japan and Hawaii. Proteinuria was also a risk factor in Hawaii. Conversely, an index of animal food intake was inversely related to total stroke, significantly in Hawaii, and at a suggestive level for total and hemorrhagic stroke in Japan. Since the levels of blood pressure do not differ between Japan and Hawaii, one possible explanation for the large difference in stroke incidence between the two cohorts may be the fact that animal protein and saturated fat intake, which is inversely associated with stroke incidence, is much greater in Hawaii than in Japan. This explanation would support epidemiologic and experimental studies in Japan which suggest that dietary animal protein and fat exert an inhibitory effect on the incidence of stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-23
Number of pages9
JournalStroke
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: Incidence of stroke in Japan and Hawaii'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this