Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement

Alvin I. Goldman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses two distinct topics in social epistemology: epistemological relativism and peer disagreement. It characterizes epistemological relativism by treating it as a combination of three theses. It then proposes a novel version of relativism that may be appealing to firm objectivists. Next, it looks at the relativization proposal, which is supported by the notion of iterative justification. The chapter also gives provisional suggestions for applying these ideas to the peer disagreement problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationReliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology
Subtitle of host publicationEssays
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199933150
ISBN (Print)9780199812875
DOIs
StatePublished - May 24 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Keywords

  • Epistemological relativism
  • Iterative justification
  • Peer disagreement
  • Relativization proposal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this