Equality versus priority: A misleading distinction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The question for those who are concerned with inequalities is not whether to be an egalitarian or a prioritarian. That choice is mislabelled and misconceived. The relevant question is why distributive inequalities are of more than merely instrumental importance with respect to unrelated goals, such as maximizing well-being. The answer is that lessening inequalities in well-being serves a fundamental commitment to equality of moral status. Depending on the circumstances and what is to be distributed, the underlying concern with equality of moral status (coupled with non-distributional concerns about deprivation) might make one resemble a prioritarian, a non-prioritarian egalitarian, or neither.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-238
Number of pages10
JournalEconomics and Philosophy
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 7 2015
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Economics and Econometrics

Keywords

  • Egalitarianism
  • Moral Status
  • Prioritarianism
  • Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Equality versus priority: A misleading distinction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this