Abstract
The question for those who are concerned with inequalities is not whether to be an egalitarian or a prioritarian. That choice is mislabelled and misconceived. The relevant question is why distributive inequalities are of more than merely instrumental importance with respect to unrelated goals, such as maximizing well-being. The answer is that lessening inequalities in well-being serves a fundamental commitment to equality of moral status. Depending on the circumstances and what is to be distributed, the underlying concern with equality of moral status (coupled with non-distributional concerns about deprivation) might make one resemble a prioritarian, a non-prioritarian egalitarian, or neither.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 229-238 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Economics and Philosophy |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 7 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Egalitarianism
- Moral Status
- Prioritarianism
- Well-being