Abstract
Surveys of almost 1,500 members of three professional societies that do risk analysis (e.g. environmental economics, epidemiology, exposure assessment, industrial hygiene, toxicology) found that 3 in 10 respondents had observed a biased research design, 2 in 10 had observed plagiarism, and 1 in 10 observed data fabrication or falsification. Respondents with many years in risk analysis, business consultants, and industrial hygienists reported the greatest prevalence of misconduct. These respondents perceived poor science, economic implications of the research, and lack of training in ethics as causes of misconduct. They supported the teaching of ethics but the vast majority did not support government auditing of their work.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 223-241 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Science, Technology & Human Values |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1994 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Anthropology
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Human-Computer Interaction