Abstract
Although the textualist critique of ethnography has challenged the possibility of science in cultural anthropology, insights provided by that critique are crucial for the further development of a scientific approach in the discipline. The value of the textualist critique of ethnography for the development of scientific ethnology can best be seen through an analogy with archaeology. Just as archaeologists' ability to reconstruct the past has been enhanced, not undermined, by a detailed understanding of archaeological site formation processes, so can ethnologists' ability to understand patterns within and among human societies be enhanced through a better understanding of ethnographic text formation processes. Key elements of the textualist critique of ethnography, including an emphasis on reflexivity, multivocality, and the process of writing ethnography, are great aids in the elucidation of ethnographic text formation processes.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 321-349 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Social Science Information |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1998 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
- Library and Information Sciences
Keywords
- Ethnography
- Ethnology
- Postmodernism
- Science
- Textualism