Abstract
Limited evidence exists as to the most effective ways to provide simulation experiences to maximize student learning. This quasi-experimental study investigated 2 different strategies repeated versus 1 exposure and participation versus observation on student outcomes following exposure to a high-fidelity acute asthma exacerbation of asthma scenario. Immediate repeated exposure resulted in significantly higher scores on knowledge, student satisfaction and self-confidence, and clinical performance measures than a single exposure. Significant intergroup differences were found on participants’ satisfaction and self-confidence as compared with observers. Implications for nurse educators include expanding the observer role when designing repeated exposure to simulations and integrating technical, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes as a way for faculty to evaluate students’ clinical performance.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 349-357 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Professional Nursing |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Nursing(all)
Keywords
- High-fidelity simulation
- Index words
- Learning outcomes
- Nursing education
- Simulation design