Evaluation of a non-chemical compared to a non-chemical plus silica gel approach to bed bug management

Salehe Abbar, Changlu Wang, Richard Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bed bug resistance to commonly used pesticide sprays has led to exploring new pesticides and other strategies for bed bug management. Non-chemical methods are effective in bed bug management; however, they do not provide residual protection. Compared to insecticide sprays, dust formulations are considered to provide longer residual control. We evaluated two bed bug management programs in apartment buildings. A building-wide inspection was initially conducted to identify bed bug infested apartments. Selected apartments were divided into two treatment groups: non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment (10 apartments) and non-chemical treatment (11 apartments). After initial treatment, apartments were re-visited monthly for up to 6 months. During each visit, the total bed bug count per apartment was obtained by examining interceptor traps placed in the apartments and conducting a visual inspection. Mean bed bug count was reduced by 99% and 89% in non-chemical plus silica gel dust and non-chemical treatment, respectively. Non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment caused significantly higher bed bug count reduction than the non-chemical treatment at 6 months. Bed bugs were eradicated from 40% and 36% of apartments treated with non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment and non-chemical treatment, respectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number443
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalInsects
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Insect Science

Keywords

  • Cimex lectularius
  • Non-chemical treatment
  • Silica gel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of a non-chemical compared to a non-chemical plus silica gel approach to bed bug management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this