Abstract
Sober and Wilson have propose a cluster of arguments for the conclusion that "natural selection is unlikely to have given us purely egoistic motives" and thus that psychological altruism is true. I maintain that none of these arguments is convincing. However, the most powerful of their arguments raises deep issues about what egoists and altruists are claiming and about the assumptions they make concerning the cognitive architecture underlying human motivation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 267-281 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Biology and Philosophy |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2007 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- History and Philosophy of Science
Keywords
- Altruism
- Cognitive architecture
- Egoism, Evolution
- Intrinsic and instrumental desire
- Natural selection
- Sub-doxastic states