TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining the trade-offs of palm oil production and consumption from a sustainable diets perspective
T2 - Lessons learned from Myanmar
AU - Downs, Shauna M.
AU - Nicholas, Khristopher
AU - Khine Linn, Kay
AU - Fanzo, Jessica
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements: We thank Mark Grindley for providing feedback on the research design. Financial support: This study was funded by an early-career researcher grant from the Nutrition Science Programs (formerly the Sackler Institute for Nutritional Sciences), New York Academy of Sciences. Conflicts of interest: The author has no conflicts of interest. Authorship: S.M.D. conceived the study and carried out data collection with L.K.K., conducted data analysis and wrote the initial manuscript draft. K.N. assisted with data analysis, and J.F. provided feedback on the study design. All authors contributed to the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2021.
PY - 2022/4/15
Y1 - 2022/4/15
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the trade-offs related to the production and consumption of palm oil in Myanmar from a sustainable diets perspective. Design: We used an enhanced value chain analysis approach that included semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders; market analyses to assess edible oils in markets and focus groups as well as surveys with consumers to ascertain their perceptions and practices related to edible oils. Setting: Four settings in Myanmar (upper income urban; lower income urban; middle-income urban; lower income rural). Participants: Key stakeholders (n 12) from government, trade bodies and civil society organisations were included in the interviews. Women from each of the regions participated in four focus groups (n 32), and a convenience sample of male and female consumers participated in the surveys (n 362). Results: We found mistrust of the oil sector overall. Poor production practices, leading to low yields, limit the economic viability of oil palm production in Myanmar and contribute to negative environmental (e.g. deforestation) and social outcomes (e.g. land conflicts). Consumers demonstrated low preferences for palm oil as compared with traditional oils from a taste, health and transparency perspective; however, they indicated that its relative low cost led to its purchase over other oils. Conclusions: The Burmese example suggests that there may be limited benefits, and significant costs, of investing in palm oil production in regions where there are coordinating disincentives from a sustainable diets perspective. However, if oil palm cultivation is to continue, there are opportunities to improve its economic viability and environmental sustainability.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the trade-offs related to the production and consumption of palm oil in Myanmar from a sustainable diets perspective. Design: We used an enhanced value chain analysis approach that included semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders; market analyses to assess edible oils in markets and focus groups as well as surveys with consumers to ascertain their perceptions and practices related to edible oils. Setting: Four settings in Myanmar (upper income urban; lower income urban; middle-income urban; lower income rural). Participants: Key stakeholders (n 12) from government, trade bodies and civil society organisations were included in the interviews. Women from each of the regions participated in four focus groups (n 32), and a convenience sample of male and female consumers participated in the surveys (n 362). Results: We found mistrust of the oil sector overall. Poor production practices, leading to low yields, limit the economic viability of oil palm production in Myanmar and contribute to negative environmental (e.g. deforestation) and social outcomes (e.g. land conflicts). Consumers demonstrated low preferences for palm oil as compared with traditional oils from a taste, health and transparency perspective; however, they indicated that its relative low cost led to its purchase over other oils. Conclusions: The Burmese example suggests that there may be limited benefits, and significant costs, of investing in palm oil production in regions where there are coordinating disincentives from a sustainable diets perspective. However, if oil palm cultivation is to continue, there are opportunities to improve its economic viability and environmental sustainability.
KW - Consumer preferences
KW - Myanmar
KW - Palm oil
KW - Value chain analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119481561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119481561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1368980021004353
DO - 10.1017/S1368980021004353
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85119481561
SN - 1368-9800
VL - 25
SP - 964
EP - 976
JO - Public Health Nutrition
JF - Public Health Nutrition
IS - 4
ER -