Exploring the gender gap and the impact of residential location on environmental risk tolerance

Marc Weiner, Timothy D. MacKinnon, Michael Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To explore the effects of the gender gap and differences in residential location on environmental risk tolerance, we analyze data from the US general population and from households living with 50 miles of a US nuclear facility. We hypothesize that a potentially hazardous facility in close proximity to a residential community generates a constant risk signal that conditions and desensitizes that local population, causing the gender gap to converge and causing overall higher risk tolerance levels. We find support for this "context matters" hypothesis, i.e., that in environmentally stressed communities, the gender gap does converge, and males and females exhibit approximately equal levels of risk tolerance greater than those in non-stressed communities. We conclude that when modeling environmental risk tolerance both gender and place of residence should be considered potentially meaningful explanatory variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-201
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume36
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Keywords

  • Environmental risk tolerance
  • Gender gap
  • Priming experiment
  • Residential location effect
  • Stressed location

Cite this

@article{02a1944378bc4fee9f23e4219915a57f,
title = "Exploring the gender gap and the impact of residential location on environmental risk tolerance",
abstract = "To explore the effects of the gender gap and differences in residential location on environmental risk tolerance, we analyze data from the US general population and from households living with 50 miles of a US nuclear facility. We hypothesize that a potentially hazardous facility in close proximity to a residential community generates a constant risk signal that conditions and desensitizes that local population, causing the gender gap to converge and causing overall higher risk tolerance levels. We find support for this {"}context matters{"} hypothesis, i.e., that in environmentally stressed communities, the gender gap does converge, and males and females exhibit approximately equal levels of risk tolerance greater than those in non-stressed communities. We conclude that when modeling environmental risk tolerance both gender and place of residence should be considered potentially meaningful explanatory variables.",
keywords = "Environmental risk tolerance, Gender gap, Priming experiment, Residential location effect, Stressed location",
author = "Marc Weiner and MacKinnon, {Timothy D.} and Michael Greenberg",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "190--201",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4944",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Exploring the gender gap and the impact of residential location on environmental risk tolerance. / Weiner, Marc; MacKinnon, Timothy D.; Greenberg, Michael.

In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 36, 01.12.2013, p. 190-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the gender gap and the impact of residential location on environmental risk tolerance

AU - Weiner, Marc

AU - MacKinnon, Timothy D.

AU - Greenberg, Michael

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - To explore the effects of the gender gap and differences in residential location on environmental risk tolerance, we analyze data from the US general population and from households living with 50 miles of a US nuclear facility. We hypothesize that a potentially hazardous facility in close proximity to a residential community generates a constant risk signal that conditions and desensitizes that local population, causing the gender gap to converge and causing overall higher risk tolerance levels. We find support for this "context matters" hypothesis, i.e., that in environmentally stressed communities, the gender gap does converge, and males and females exhibit approximately equal levels of risk tolerance greater than those in non-stressed communities. We conclude that when modeling environmental risk tolerance both gender and place of residence should be considered potentially meaningful explanatory variables.

AB - To explore the effects of the gender gap and differences in residential location on environmental risk tolerance, we analyze data from the US general population and from households living with 50 miles of a US nuclear facility. We hypothesize that a potentially hazardous facility in close proximity to a residential community generates a constant risk signal that conditions and desensitizes that local population, causing the gender gap to converge and causing overall higher risk tolerance levels. We find support for this "context matters" hypothesis, i.e., that in environmentally stressed communities, the gender gap does converge, and males and females exhibit approximately equal levels of risk tolerance greater than those in non-stressed communities. We conclude that when modeling environmental risk tolerance both gender and place of residence should be considered potentially meaningful explanatory variables.

KW - Environmental risk tolerance

KW - Gender gap

KW - Priming experiment

KW - Residential location effect

KW - Stressed location

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883319803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883319803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883319803

VL - 36

SP - 190

EP - 201

JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology

SN - 0272-4944

ER -