TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Affecting Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement During Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation
AU - Alberto, Emily C.
AU - Mastrianni, Angela
AU - Sullivan, Travis M.
AU - McCarthy, Kathleen H.
AU - Milestone, Zachary P.
AU - Chung, Lauren
AU - Cha, Nicholas
AU - Mapelli, Emily
AU - Sippel, Genevieve J.
AU - Marsic, Ivan
AU - O'Connell, Karen J.
AU - Sarcevic, Aleksandra
AU - Burd, Randall S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to disclose that the work was supported by the National Institutes of Health: award number R01LM011834. The authors report no other proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Introduction: Intravenous access is required for resuscitation of injured patients but may be delayed in children because of challenges associated with peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement. Early identification of factors predisposing patients to difficult PIV placement can assist in deciding strategies for timely intravenous access. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, video-based review of injured children and adolescents treated between April 2018 and May 2019. Patient demographic, physiological, injury, and resuscitation characteristics were obtained from the patient record, including age, race, weight, injury type, Injury Severity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, initial Glasgow Coma Score, intubation status, activation level, and presence of prearrival notification. Video review was used to determine the time to PIV placement, the number of attempts required, the purpose for additional access, and the reason for abandonment of PIV placement. Multivariable regressions were used to determine factors associated with successful placement. Results: During the study period, 154 consented patients underwent attempts at PIV placement in the trauma bay. Placement was successful in 139 (90.3%) patients. Older patients (OR [odds ratio]: 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9, 0.9) and patients who required the highest level activation response (OR: 0.0, 95% CI: 0.0, 0.3) were less likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Children with nonblunt injuries (OR: 11.6, 95% CI: 1.3, 119.2) and pre-existing access (OR: 39.6, 95% CI: 7.0, 350.6) were more likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Among patients with successful PIV placement, the time required for establishing PIV access was faster as age increased (−0.5 s, 95% CI: −1.1, −0.0). Conclusions: Younger age was associated with abandonment of PIV attempts and, when successful, increased time to placement. Strategies to improve successful PIV placement and alternate routes of access should be considered early to prevent treatment delays in younger children.
AB - Introduction: Intravenous access is required for resuscitation of injured patients but may be delayed in children because of challenges associated with peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement. Early identification of factors predisposing patients to difficult PIV placement can assist in deciding strategies for timely intravenous access. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, video-based review of injured children and adolescents treated between April 2018 and May 2019. Patient demographic, physiological, injury, and resuscitation characteristics were obtained from the patient record, including age, race, weight, injury type, Injury Severity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, initial Glasgow Coma Score, intubation status, activation level, and presence of prearrival notification. Video review was used to determine the time to PIV placement, the number of attempts required, the purpose for additional access, and the reason for abandonment of PIV placement. Multivariable regressions were used to determine factors associated with successful placement. Results: During the study period, 154 consented patients underwent attempts at PIV placement in the trauma bay. Placement was successful in 139 (90.3%) patients. Older patients (OR [odds ratio]: 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9, 0.9) and patients who required the highest level activation response (OR: 0.0, 95% CI: 0.0, 0.3) were less likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Children with nonblunt injuries (OR: 11.6, 95% CI: 1.3, 119.2) and pre-existing access (OR: 39.6, 95% CI: 7.0, 350.6) were more likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Among patients with successful PIV placement, the time required for establishing PIV access was faster as age increased (−0.5 s, 95% CI: −1.1, −0.0). Conclusions: Younger age was associated with abandonment of PIV attempts and, when successful, increased time to placement. Strategies to improve successful PIV placement and alternate routes of access should be considered early to prevent treatment delays in younger children.
KW - Catheterization
KW - Pediatrics
KW - Peripheral
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142315338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142315338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.048
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.048
M3 - Article
C2 - 36423472
AN - SCOPUS:85142315338
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 283
SP - 241
EP - 248
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -