Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology

Alexandre Buckley De Meritens, Julia Kim, Helen Dinkelspiel, Eloise Chapman-Davis, Thomas Caputo, Kevin M. Holcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Single-site laparoscopy has proven to be a desirable option for patients undergoing gynecologic surgery, with some studies indicating improved cosmesis and less perioperative pain compared with standard approaches. This study describes the safety and feasibility of a novel robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) platform as it is incorporated into a surgeon's practice with extensive multiport robotic surgical experience but limited LESS experience. We reviewed 83 women undergoing R-LESS by a single surgeon from September 2013 through August 2015. Operative times (total operative time, console time, docking time) were collected prospectively for the first 53 cases, and total operative time was collected retrospectively for the next 30 cases. Clinical parameters, including age, estimated blood loss, body mass index (BMI), prior abdominal surgeries, conversion to laparotomy, procedure type, uterine weight, length of hospital stay, and complications, were retrospectively collected from medical charts. Eighty-two of 83 surgeries were completed successfully with a single incision. One surgery was converted to multiport robotics for para-aortic lymph node dissection. Twelve surgeries were performed for cancer (ovary 1, uterus 8, and cervix 3). Eight patients underwent pelvic lymph node biopsy. The median total operative time for hysterectomies was 128 minutes (range, 60–275). After the first 13 hysterectomies the total operative time and the console time decreased significantly from 165.3 to 131.1 minutes (p = .032) and from 84.9 to 57.1 minutes (p = .028), respectively. Mean docking time halved from 7.8 minutes to 3.4 minutes comparing the first 10 cases to the last 10 cases. Surgical times were longer with larger BMIs, but the console time decreased with experience regardless of BMI. The mean uterine weight was 164 g (range, 30–460). Complications included 2 umbilical hernias (2.4%) and 1 conversion to multiport. In conclusion, R-LESS is a feasible and safe surgical platform for gynecologic procedures. A small number of cases are needed to significantly improve operative times when it is introduced on a surgeon's practice with limited experience in LESS but familiar with robotic surgery. Further study is needed to investigate the cost, benefits, and long-term outcomes of R-LESS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-328
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Robotics
Gynecology
Operative Time
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Hysterectomy
Length of Stay
Body Mass Index
Weights and Measures
Umbilical Hernia
Lymph Node Excision
Cervix Uteri
Ovarian Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Lymph Nodes
Biopsy
Safety
Pain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Keywords

  • Gynecology
  • Robotic
  • Single-site laparoendoscopy

Cite this

Buckley De Meritens, Alexandre ; Kim, Julia ; Dinkelspiel, Helen ; Chapman-Davis, Eloise ; Caputo, Thomas ; Holcomb, Kevin M. / Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology. In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 323-328.
@article{c48c4bc4946542ecab667db23a124347,
title = "Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology",
abstract = "Single-site laparoscopy has proven to be a desirable option for patients undergoing gynecologic surgery, with some studies indicating improved cosmesis and less perioperative pain compared with standard approaches. This study describes the safety and feasibility of a novel robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) platform as it is incorporated into a surgeon's practice with extensive multiport robotic surgical experience but limited LESS experience. We reviewed 83 women undergoing R-LESS by a single surgeon from September 2013 through August 2015. Operative times (total operative time, console time, docking time) were collected prospectively for the first 53 cases, and total operative time was collected retrospectively for the next 30 cases. Clinical parameters, including age, estimated blood loss, body mass index (BMI), prior abdominal surgeries, conversion to laparotomy, procedure type, uterine weight, length of hospital stay, and complications, were retrospectively collected from medical charts. Eighty-two of 83 surgeries were completed successfully with a single incision. One surgery was converted to multiport robotics for para-aortic lymph node dissection. Twelve surgeries were performed for cancer (ovary 1, uterus 8, and cervix 3). Eight patients underwent pelvic lymph node biopsy. The median total operative time for hysterectomies was 128 minutes (range, 60–275). After the first 13 hysterectomies the total operative time and the console time decreased significantly from 165.3 to 131.1 minutes (p = .032) and from 84.9 to 57.1 minutes (p = .028), respectively. Mean docking time halved from 7.8 minutes to 3.4 minutes comparing the first 10 cases to the last 10 cases. Surgical times were longer with larger BMIs, but the console time decreased with experience regardless of BMI. The mean uterine weight was 164 g (range, 30–460). Complications included 2 umbilical hernias (2.4{\%}) and 1 conversion to multiport. In conclusion, R-LESS is a feasible and safe surgical platform for gynecologic procedures. A small number of cases are needed to significantly improve operative times when it is introduced on a surgeon's practice with limited experience in LESS but familiar with robotic surgery. Further study is needed to investigate the cost, benefits, and long-term outcomes of R-LESS.",
keywords = "Gynecology, Robotic, Single-site laparoendoscopy",
author = "{Buckley De Meritens}, Alexandre and Julia Kim and Helen Dinkelspiel and Eloise Chapman-Davis and Thomas Caputo and Holcomb, {Kevin M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "323--328",
journal = "Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology",
issn = "1553-4650",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology. / Buckley De Meritens, Alexandre; Kim, Julia; Dinkelspiel, Helen; Chapman-Davis, Eloise; Caputo, Thomas; Holcomb, Kevin M.

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 323-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology

AU - Buckley De Meritens, Alexandre

AU - Kim, Julia

AU - Dinkelspiel, Helen

AU - Chapman-Davis, Eloise

AU - Caputo, Thomas

AU - Holcomb, Kevin M.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Single-site laparoscopy has proven to be a desirable option for patients undergoing gynecologic surgery, with some studies indicating improved cosmesis and less perioperative pain compared with standard approaches. This study describes the safety and feasibility of a novel robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) platform as it is incorporated into a surgeon's practice with extensive multiport robotic surgical experience but limited LESS experience. We reviewed 83 women undergoing R-LESS by a single surgeon from September 2013 through August 2015. Operative times (total operative time, console time, docking time) were collected prospectively for the first 53 cases, and total operative time was collected retrospectively for the next 30 cases. Clinical parameters, including age, estimated blood loss, body mass index (BMI), prior abdominal surgeries, conversion to laparotomy, procedure type, uterine weight, length of hospital stay, and complications, were retrospectively collected from medical charts. Eighty-two of 83 surgeries were completed successfully with a single incision. One surgery was converted to multiport robotics for para-aortic lymph node dissection. Twelve surgeries were performed for cancer (ovary 1, uterus 8, and cervix 3). Eight patients underwent pelvic lymph node biopsy. The median total operative time for hysterectomies was 128 minutes (range, 60–275). After the first 13 hysterectomies the total operative time and the console time decreased significantly from 165.3 to 131.1 minutes (p = .032) and from 84.9 to 57.1 minutes (p = .028), respectively. Mean docking time halved from 7.8 minutes to 3.4 minutes comparing the first 10 cases to the last 10 cases. Surgical times were longer with larger BMIs, but the console time decreased with experience regardless of BMI. The mean uterine weight was 164 g (range, 30–460). Complications included 2 umbilical hernias (2.4%) and 1 conversion to multiport. In conclusion, R-LESS is a feasible and safe surgical platform for gynecologic procedures. A small number of cases are needed to significantly improve operative times when it is introduced on a surgeon's practice with limited experience in LESS but familiar with robotic surgery. Further study is needed to investigate the cost, benefits, and long-term outcomes of R-LESS.

AB - Single-site laparoscopy has proven to be a desirable option for patients undergoing gynecologic surgery, with some studies indicating improved cosmesis and less perioperative pain compared with standard approaches. This study describes the safety and feasibility of a novel robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) platform as it is incorporated into a surgeon's practice with extensive multiport robotic surgical experience but limited LESS experience. We reviewed 83 women undergoing R-LESS by a single surgeon from September 2013 through August 2015. Operative times (total operative time, console time, docking time) were collected prospectively for the first 53 cases, and total operative time was collected retrospectively for the next 30 cases. Clinical parameters, including age, estimated blood loss, body mass index (BMI), prior abdominal surgeries, conversion to laparotomy, procedure type, uterine weight, length of hospital stay, and complications, were retrospectively collected from medical charts. Eighty-two of 83 surgeries were completed successfully with a single incision. One surgery was converted to multiport robotics for para-aortic lymph node dissection. Twelve surgeries were performed for cancer (ovary 1, uterus 8, and cervix 3). Eight patients underwent pelvic lymph node biopsy. The median total operative time for hysterectomies was 128 minutes (range, 60–275). After the first 13 hysterectomies the total operative time and the console time decreased significantly from 165.3 to 131.1 minutes (p = .032) and from 84.9 to 57.1 minutes (p = .028), respectively. Mean docking time halved from 7.8 minutes to 3.4 minutes comparing the first 10 cases to the last 10 cases. Surgical times were longer with larger BMIs, but the console time decreased with experience regardless of BMI. The mean uterine weight was 164 g (range, 30–460). Complications included 2 umbilical hernias (2.4%) and 1 conversion to multiport. In conclusion, R-LESS is a feasible and safe surgical platform for gynecologic procedures. A small number of cases are needed to significantly improve operative times when it is introduced on a surgeon's practice with limited experience in LESS but familiar with robotic surgery. Further study is needed to investigate the cost, benefits, and long-term outcomes of R-LESS.

KW - Gynecology

KW - Robotic

KW - Single-site laparoendoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011545510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011545510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 27867048

AN - SCOPUS:85011545510

VL - 24

SP - 323

EP - 328

JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

SN - 1553-4650

IS - 2

ER -