“Fighting the Good Fight”: Why Do Public Defenders Remain on the Job?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, we ask why public defenders remain on the job despite a number of unique and testing work-related challenges. To answer this question, we analyze original data collected through 87 semistructured interviews with public defenders from government, nonprofit, and appointed counsel systems across the United States. Participants explicated a set of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations salient to their decision to remain in public defense: interacting with clients, defending the Constitution, fighting social inequality, pursuing personal values, appreciating camaraderie with colleagues, and earning public sector benefits. We discuss how our findings relate to prior research, identify directions for future studies, and tentatively engage policy implications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)939-961
Number of pages23
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Keywords

  • indigent defense
  • public defenders
  • work motivations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Fighting the Good Fight”: Why Do Public Defenders Remain on the Job?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this