TY - JOUR
T1 - Flexible work time in Germany
T2 - Do workers like it and how have employers exploited it over the cycle?
AU - Hunt, Jennifer
N1 - Funding Information:
∗I thank Markus Poschke and Ines Zapf for comments on the manuscript, Francesco Fasani, Joan Llull, and Eugen Spitznagel for helpful conversations and Bin Xie for research assistance. I am grateful to the Rutgers University Research Council for financial support. I am also affiliated with the CEPR (London).
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - After describing qualitatively the increasingly flexible organization of work hours in Germany, I turn to the German Socio-Economic Panel to quantify practices and trends, and assess their effects on workers and employers. Measuring flexibility as the extent to which overtime is compensated with time off, and hence receives no overtime premium, I show that hourly-paid workers have undergone a regime shift towards more flexibility since 1984, while salaried workers have maintained an already high level of flexibility. I find weak evidence that flexibility causes workers to be slightly less satisfied with their work and more satisfied with their leisure. Over the boom and bust cycle of 2005-2009, I find that for hourly-paid workers in manufacturing, paid and unpaid overtime hours were equally cyclical, but that the cycle for unpaid overtime led the cycle for paid overtime. The results suggest that while the new practices do free employers to make more cyclical adjustments in hours, they have not eliminated the need for adjustments in paid overtime. I identify as constraints ceilings on cumulated overtime hours to be compensated with time off and the window within which the compensation in time off must occur.
AB - After describing qualitatively the increasingly flexible organization of work hours in Germany, I turn to the German Socio-Economic Panel to quantify practices and trends, and assess their effects on workers and employers. Measuring flexibility as the extent to which overtime is compensated with time off, and hence receives no overtime premium, I show that hourly-paid workers have undergone a regime shift towards more flexibility since 1984, while salaried workers have maintained an already high level of flexibility. I find weak evidence that flexibility causes workers to be slightly less satisfied with their work and more satisfied with their leisure. Over the boom and bust cycle of 2005-2009, I find that for hourly-paid workers in manufacturing, paid and unpaid overtime hours were equally cyclical, but that the cycle for unpaid overtime led the cycle for paid overtime. The results suggest that while the new practices do free employers to make more cyclical adjustments in hours, they have not eliminated the need for adjustments in paid overtime. I identify as constraints ceilings on cumulated overtime hours to be compensated with time off and the window within which the compensation in time off must occur.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880405114&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880405114&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pers.12005
DO - 10.1111/pers.12005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84880405114
VL - 14
SP - 67
EP - 98
JO - Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik
JF - Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik
SN - 1465-6493
IS - 1-2
ER -