TY - JOUR
T1 - Follicular lymphoma in the modern era
T2 - survival, treatment outcomes, and identification of high-risk subgroups
AU - Batlevi, Connie L.
AU - Sha, Fushen
AU - Alperovich, Anna
AU - Ni, Ai
AU - Smith, Katy
AU - Ying, Zhitao
AU - Soumerai, Jacob D.
AU - Caron, Philip C.
AU - Falchi, Lorenzo
AU - Hamilton, Audrey
AU - Hamlin, Paul A.
AU - Horwitz, Steven M.
AU - Joffe, Erel
AU - Kumar, Anita
AU - Matasar, Matthew J.
AU - Moskowitz, Alison J.
AU - Moskowitz, Craig H.
AU - Noy, Ariela
AU - Owens, Colette
AU - Palomba, Lia M.
AU - Straus, David
AU - von Keudell, Gottfried
AU - Zelenetz, Andrew D.
AU - Seshan, Venkatraman E.
AU - Younes, Anas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) frequently require multiple treatments during their disease course; however, survival based on lines of treatment remains poorly described in the post-rituximab era. Also, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score was developed to predict survival at diagnosis, yet it remains unknown whether increase in FLIPI score following an initial observation period is associated with less-favorable outcomes. To address these knowledge gaps, we retrospectively studied 1088 patients with FL grade 1–3A managed between 1998 and 2009 at our institution. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment were not reached and 4.73 years, respectively. Following successive lines of treatment, years of median OS and PFS were, respectively: after second-line, 11.7 and 1.5; third-line, 8.8 and 1.1; fourth-line, 5.3 and 0.9; fifth-line, 3.1 and 0.6; sixth-line, 1.9 and 0.5. In initially observed, subsequently treated patients, FLIPI score increase after observation was associated with inferior survival following first-line treatment. The reduced survival we observed after second-line and later therapy supports the development of new treatments for relapsed patients and benchmarks historical targets for clinical endpoints. This study also highlights the utility of changes in FLIPI score at diagnosis and after observation in identifying patients likely to have worse outcomes.
AB - Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) frequently require multiple treatments during their disease course; however, survival based on lines of treatment remains poorly described in the post-rituximab era. Also, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score was developed to predict survival at diagnosis, yet it remains unknown whether increase in FLIPI score following an initial observation period is associated with less-favorable outcomes. To address these knowledge gaps, we retrospectively studied 1088 patients with FL grade 1–3A managed between 1998 and 2009 at our institution. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment were not reached and 4.73 years, respectively. Following successive lines of treatment, years of median OS and PFS were, respectively: after second-line, 11.7 and 1.5; third-line, 8.8 and 1.1; fourth-line, 5.3 and 0.9; fifth-line, 3.1 and 0.6; sixth-line, 1.9 and 0.5. In initially observed, subsequently treated patients, FLIPI score increase after observation was associated with inferior survival following first-line treatment. The reduced survival we observed after second-line and later therapy supports the development of new treatments for relapsed patients and benchmarks historical targets for clinical endpoints. This study also highlights the utility of changes in FLIPI score at diagnosis and after observation in identifying patients likely to have worse outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088093086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088093086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41408-020-00340-z
DO - 10.1038/s41408-020-00340-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 32678074
AN - SCOPUS:85088093086
SN - 2044-5385
VL - 10
JO - Blood Cancer Journal
JF - Blood Cancer Journal
IS - 7
M1 - 74
ER -