Gender differences in meal patterns: Role of self-caught fish and wild game in meat and fish diets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

The hypothesis that there are gender differences in consumption patterns of self-caught fish and wild game in the meat and fish diet was examined for 415 people attending the Palmetto Sportsmen's Classic in Columbia, South Carolina. Women were less likely to eat most types of wild fish and game than were men, although there were no gender differences in the percentage eating beef, chicken, pork, and restaurant and store-bought fish. Similarly, women consumed significantly fewer meals of wild-caught fish and game than did men, although the number of meals of most store-bought foods did not differ. Both men and women who ate more meals of fish ate a higher percentage of wild- caught fish than either store-bought or restaurant fish. People with low number of fish and meat meals ate mainly fish; people eating over 30 meals of meat and fish a month ate mainly meat. Only about 9% of those interviewed said that they changed their fish consumption patterns when they, or their spouse, were pregnant. These gender-specific data on protein consumption can be used for exposure assessment and risk management decisions regarding consumption advisories for wild-caught fish and game. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)140-149
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental research
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2000

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in meal patterns: Role of self-caught fish and wild game in meat and fish diets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this