TY - GEN
T1 - Highly efficient evaluation design (HEED) for comparing algorithms used to detect nuclear materials
AU - Kantor, Paul
AU - Nelson, Christie
AU - Roberts, Fred
AU - Pottenger, William M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Jay Spingarn of DHS/DNDO who identified the problem, supported the research, and suggested the need for probe values, Dr. Detlof von Winterfeldt and colleagues at the CREATE Center, and Dr. Gariann Gelston and colleagues at PNNL. We thank Dr. Siddartha Dalal and Dr. Ashish Jain for introducing us to the notions of combinatorial experimental design. We also acknowledge support from DNDO Contract # HSHQDC-13-X-00069, DHS Contract #DHS-2009-ST-061-CCI002-06, and NSF Grant # 1247696 and 1142251.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Radiological or nuclear materials are detected in vehicles by processing data from sensor systems. The key goals/objectives are to detect threats and control the number of "nuisance" alarms caused by non-threat materials. It is important to evaluate algorithms efficiently and fairly. Experiments can be done in silico or using real loads of cargo containing hidden radiation sources which is time-consuming and costly. In either mode, sensor data serve as inputs to the algorithms, whose outputs can be compared to ground truth. The goal is not to map the complete characteristics of an algorithm, but to compare algorithms. Therefore it is most efficient to concentrate on experimental configurations that reveal meaningful differences between the algorithms. The methods of Combinatorial Experimental Design are used to generate configurations that will find all situations in which one or two levels of key parameters reveal such a difference. In practice, an efficient set must be further reviewed by subject matter experts, who are tasked to specify configurations that would reveal meaningful differences among the algorithms. Experts may also assign importance values to the remaining configurations, based on other considerations related to the likelihood or consequences of the corresponding threat.
AB - Radiological or nuclear materials are detected in vehicles by processing data from sensor systems. The key goals/objectives are to detect threats and control the number of "nuisance" alarms caused by non-threat materials. It is important to evaluate algorithms efficiently and fairly. Experiments can be done in silico or using real loads of cargo containing hidden radiation sources which is time-consuming and costly. In either mode, sensor data serve as inputs to the algorithms, whose outputs can be compared to ground truth. The goal is not to map the complete characteristics of an algorithm, but to compare algorithms. Therefore it is most efficient to concentrate on experimental configurations that reveal meaningful differences between the algorithms. The methods of Combinatorial Experimental Design are used to generate configurations that will find all situations in which one or two levels of key parameters reveal such a difference. In practice, an efficient set must be further reviewed by subject matter experts, who are tasked to specify configurations that would reveal meaningful differences among the algorithms. Experts may also assign importance values to the remaining configurations, based on other considerations related to the likelihood or consequences of the corresponding threat.
KW - Combinatorial experimental design
KW - Experimental design
KW - Nuclear detection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970956399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970956399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84970956399
T3 - IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2015
SP - 1842
EP - 1851
BT - IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2015
PB - Institute of Industrial Engineers
T2 - IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2015
Y2 - 30 May 2015 through 2 June 2015
ER -