TY - JOUR
T1 - Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy
AU - Xu, Xiao
AU - Desai, Vrunda B.
AU - Wright, Jason D.
AU - Lin, Haiqun
AU - Schwartz, Peter E.
AU - Gross, Cary P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by grant number R01HS024702 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The funder or sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Funding Information:
V.B.D. is an employee of CooperSurgical, Inc with an adjunct faculty appointment with Yale University . J.D.W. has served as a consultant for Tesaro and Clovis Oncology and received research funding from Merck. C.P.G. has received grant funding for research distinct from this project from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Foundation (Pfizer Inc and AstraZeneca), Genentech, Inc, and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc and funding from Flatiron Health, Inc, for traveling to and speaking at a scientific conference. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
Funding Information:
V.B.D. is an employee of CooperSurgical, Inc with an adjunct faculty appointment with Yale University. J.D.W. has served as a consultant for Tesaro and Clovis Oncology and received research funding from Merck. C.P.G. has received grant funding for research distinct from this project from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Foundation (Pfizer Inc and AstraZeneca), Genentech, Inc, and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc and funding from Flatiron Health, Inc, for traveling to and speaking at a scientific conference. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.This project was supported by grant number R01HS024702 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The funder or sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Safety warnings about power morcellation in 2014 considerably changed hysterectomy practice, especially for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy that typically requires morcellation to remove the corpus uteri while preserving the cervix. Hospitals might vary in how they respond to safety warnings and altered hysterectomy procedures to avoid use of power morcellation. However, there has been little data on how hospitals differ in their practice changes. Objective: This study aimed to examine whether hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation and compare the risk of surgical complications at hospitals that had different response trajectories in use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Study Design: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and the State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases from 14 other states. We identified women aged ≥18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the hospital inpatient and outpatient settings from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. We calculated a risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for each hospital in each calendar quarter after accounting for patient clinical risk factors. Applying a growth mixture modeling approach, we identified distinct groups of hospitals that exhibited different trajectories of using laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy over time. Within each trajectory group, we compared patients’ risk of surgical complications in the prewarning (2013Q4–2014Q1), transition (2014Q2–2014Q4), and postwarning (2015Q1–2015Q3) period using multivariable regressions. Results: Among 212,146 women undergoing benign hysterectomy at 511 hospitals, the use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy decreased from 15.1% in 2013Q4 to 6.2% in 2015Q3. The use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy at these 511 hospitals exhibited 4 distinct trajectory patterns: persistent low use (mean risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy changed from 2.8% in 2013Q4 to 0.6% in 2015Q3), decreased medium use (17.0% to 6.9%), decreased high use (51.4% to 24.2%), and rapid abandonment (30.5% to 0.8%). In the meantime, use of open abdominal hysterectomy increased by 2.1, 4.1, 7.8, and 11.8 percentage points between the prewarning and postwarning periods in these 4 trajectory groups, respectively. Compared with the prewarning period, the risk of major complications in the postwarning period decreased among patients at “persistent low use” hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–0.94). In contrast, the risk of major complications increased among patients at “rapid abandonment” hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.98), and the risk of minor complications increased among patients at “decreased high use” hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.72). Conclusion: Hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation. Complication risk increased at hospitals that shifted considerably toward open abdominal hysterectomy.
AB - Background: Safety warnings about power morcellation in 2014 considerably changed hysterectomy practice, especially for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy that typically requires morcellation to remove the corpus uteri while preserving the cervix. Hospitals might vary in how they respond to safety warnings and altered hysterectomy procedures to avoid use of power morcellation. However, there has been little data on how hospitals differ in their practice changes. Objective: This study aimed to examine whether hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation and compare the risk of surgical complications at hospitals that had different response trajectories in use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Study Design: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and the State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases from 14 other states. We identified women aged ≥18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the hospital inpatient and outpatient settings from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. We calculated a risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for each hospital in each calendar quarter after accounting for patient clinical risk factors. Applying a growth mixture modeling approach, we identified distinct groups of hospitals that exhibited different trajectories of using laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy over time. Within each trajectory group, we compared patients’ risk of surgical complications in the prewarning (2013Q4–2014Q1), transition (2014Q2–2014Q4), and postwarning (2015Q1–2015Q3) period using multivariable regressions. Results: Among 212,146 women undergoing benign hysterectomy at 511 hospitals, the use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy decreased from 15.1% in 2013Q4 to 6.2% in 2015Q3. The use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy at these 511 hospitals exhibited 4 distinct trajectory patterns: persistent low use (mean risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy changed from 2.8% in 2013Q4 to 0.6% in 2015Q3), decreased medium use (17.0% to 6.9%), decreased high use (51.4% to 24.2%), and rapid abandonment (30.5% to 0.8%). In the meantime, use of open abdominal hysterectomy increased by 2.1, 4.1, 7.8, and 11.8 percentage points between the prewarning and postwarning periods in these 4 trajectory groups, respectively. Compared with the prewarning period, the risk of major complications in the postwarning period decreased among patients at “persistent low use” hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–0.94). In contrast, the risk of major complications increased among patients at “rapid abandonment” hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.98), and the risk of minor complications increased among patients at “decreased high use” hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.72). Conclusion: Hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation. Complication risk increased at hospitals that shifted considerably toward open abdominal hysterectomy.
KW - complication
KW - hospital variation
KW - hysterectomy
KW - laparoscopic
KW - power morcellation
KW - trajectory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099852347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099852347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1207
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1207
M3 - Article
C2 - 33359176
AN - SCOPUS:85099852347
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 224
SP - 589.e1-589.e13
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 6
ER -