TY - JOUR
T1 - Hospital variation in the use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and its association with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes
AU - Safavi, Kyan C.
AU - Li, Shu Xia
AU - Dharmarajan, Kumar
AU - Venkatesh, Arjun K.
AU - Strait, Kelly M.
AU - Lin, Haiqun
AU - Lowe, Timothy J.
AU - Fazel, Reza
AU - Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
AU - Krumholz, Harlan M.
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional study of hospitals using 2010 administrative data from Premier, Inc, including patients with suspected ischemia on initial evaluation who were seen in the emergency department, observation unit, or inpatient ward; received at least 1 cardiac biomarker test on day 0 or 1; and had a principal discharge diagnosis for a common cause of chest discomfort, a sign or symptom of cardiac ischemia, and/or a comorbidity associated with coronary disease.We excluded patients with AMI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES At each hospital, the proportion of patients who received noninvasive imaging to identify cardiac ischemia and the subsequent rates of admission, coronary angiography, and revascularization procedures. RESULTS We identified 549 078 patients at 224 hospitals. The median (interquartile range) hospital noninvasive imaging rate was 19.8%(10.9%-27.7%); range, 0.2%to 55.7%. Median hospital imaging rates by quartile were Q1, 6.0%; Q2, 15.9%; Q3, 23.5%; Q4, 34.8%. Compared with Q1, Q4 hospitals had higher rates of admission (Q1, 32.1% vs Q4, 40.0%), downstream coronary angiogram (Q1, 1.2%vs Q4, 4.9%), and revascularization procedures (Q1, 0.5%vs Q4, 1.9%). Hospitals in Q4 had a lower yield of revascularization for noninvasive imaging (Q1, 7.6%vs Q4, 5.4%) and for angiograms (Q1, 41.2%vs Q4, 38.8%). P <.001 for all comparisons. Readmission rates to the same hospital for AMI within 2 months were not different by quartiles (P=.51). Approximately 23%of variation in imaging use was attributable to the behavior of individual hospitals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Hospitals vary in their use of noninvasive cardiac imaging in patients with suspected ischemia who do not have AMI. Hospitals with higher imaging rates did not have substantially different rates of therapeutic interventions or lower readmission rates for AMI but were more likely to admit patients and perform angiography.
AB - Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional study of hospitals using 2010 administrative data from Premier, Inc, including patients with suspected ischemia on initial evaluation who were seen in the emergency department, observation unit, or inpatient ward; received at least 1 cardiac biomarker test on day 0 or 1; and had a principal discharge diagnosis for a common cause of chest discomfort, a sign or symptom of cardiac ischemia, and/or a comorbidity associated with coronary disease.We excluded patients with AMI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES At each hospital, the proportion of patients who received noninvasive imaging to identify cardiac ischemia and the subsequent rates of admission, coronary angiography, and revascularization procedures. RESULTS We identified 549 078 patients at 224 hospitals. The median (interquartile range) hospital noninvasive imaging rate was 19.8%(10.9%-27.7%); range, 0.2%to 55.7%. Median hospital imaging rates by quartile were Q1, 6.0%; Q2, 15.9%; Q3, 23.5%; Q4, 34.8%. Compared with Q1, Q4 hospitals had higher rates of admission (Q1, 32.1% vs Q4, 40.0%), downstream coronary angiogram (Q1, 1.2%vs Q4, 4.9%), and revascularization procedures (Q1, 0.5%vs Q4, 1.9%). Hospitals in Q4 had a lower yield of revascularization for noninvasive imaging (Q1, 7.6%vs Q4, 5.4%) and for angiograms (Q1, 41.2%vs Q4, 38.8%). P <.001 for all comparisons. Readmission rates to the same hospital for AMI within 2 months were not different by quartiles (P=.51). Approximately 23%of variation in imaging use was attributable to the behavior of individual hospitals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Hospitals vary in their use of noninvasive cardiac imaging in patients with suspected ischemia who do not have AMI. Hospitals with higher imaging rates did not have substantially different rates of therapeutic interventions or lower readmission rates for AMI but were more likely to admit patients and perform angiography.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898419076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898419076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14407
DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14407
M3 - Article
C2 - 24515551
AN - SCOPUS:84898419076
SN - 2168-6106
VL - 174
SP - 546
EP - 553
JO - JAMA Internal Medicine
JF - JAMA Internal Medicine
IS - 4
ER -