II - Reflections on the reasonable and the rational in conflict resolution

Ruth Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Most familiar approaches to social conflict moot reasonable ways of dealing with conflict, ways that aim to serve values such as legitimacy, justice, morality, fairness, fidelity to individual preferences, and so on. In this paper, I explore an alternative approach to social conflict that contrasts with the leading approaches of Rawlsians, perfectionists, and social choice theorists. The proposed approach takes intrinsic features of the conflict - what I call a conflict's evaluative 'structure' - as grounds for a rational way of responding to that conflict. Like conflict within a single person, social conflict can have a distinctive evaluative structure that supports certain rational responses over others. I suggest that one common structure in both intra- and interpersonal cases of conflict supports the rational response of 'self-governance'. Self-governance in the case of social conflict involves a society's deliberating over the question, 'What kind of society should we be?' In liberal democracies, this rational response is also a reasonable one.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-160
Number of pages28
JournalProceedings of the Aristotelean Society, Supplementary Volumes
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'II - Reflections on the reasonable and the rational in conflict resolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this