TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Phosphorylation and Pseudophosphorylation on the Early Stages of Aggregation of the Microtubule-Associated Protein Tau
AU - Prokopovich, Dmitriy V.
AU - Whittaker, John W.
AU - Muthee, Micaiah M.
AU - Ahmed, Azka
AU - Larini, Luca
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Larini is supported by the start-up funds from Rutgers University-Camden. This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) (grant no. MCB150005), which is supported by National Science Foundation (grant no. OCI-1053575). This study used the computational resources provided by the Center for Computational and Integrative Biology (CCIB) through the National Science Foundation (grant no. DBI-1126052). This research has been supported by RDI2 through its ELF/Caliburn early adopter program.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2017/3/9
Y1 - 2017/3/9
N2 - The microtubule-associated protein tau regulates the stability of microtubules within neurons in the central nervous system. In turn, microtubules are responsible for the remodeling of the cytoskeleton that ultimately leads to the formation or pruning of new connections among neurons. As a consequence, dysfunction of tau is associated with many forms of dementia as well as Alzheimer's disease. In the brain, tau activity is regulated by its phosphorylation state. Phosphorylation is a post-translational modification of proteins that adds a phosphate group to the side chain of an amino acid. Phosphorylation at key locations in the tau sequence leads to a higher or lower affinity for microtubules. In Alzheimer's disease, tau is present in an abnormal phosphorylation state. However, studying the effect of phosphorylation experimentally has been extremely challenging as there is no viable way of exactly selecting the location and the number of phosphorylated sites. For this reason, researchers have turned to pseudophosphorylation. In this technique, actual phosphorylation is mimicked by mutating the selected amino acid into glutamate or aspartate. Whether this methodology is equivalent to actual phosphorylation is still open to debate. In this study, we will show that phosphorylation and pseudophosphorylation are not exactly equivalent. Although for larger aggregates the two techniques lead to similar structures, the kinetics of the process may be altered. In addition, very little is known about the impact that this may have on the early stages of aggregation, such as nucleation and conformational rearrangement. In this study, we show that the two methods may produce a similar ensemble of conformations, even though the kinetic and chemical details that lead to it are quite different. (Figure Presented).
AB - The microtubule-associated protein tau regulates the stability of microtubules within neurons in the central nervous system. In turn, microtubules are responsible for the remodeling of the cytoskeleton that ultimately leads to the formation or pruning of new connections among neurons. As a consequence, dysfunction of tau is associated with many forms of dementia as well as Alzheimer's disease. In the brain, tau activity is regulated by its phosphorylation state. Phosphorylation is a post-translational modification of proteins that adds a phosphate group to the side chain of an amino acid. Phosphorylation at key locations in the tau sequence leads to a higher or lower affinity for microtubules. In Alzheimer's disease, tau is present in an abnormal phosphorylation state. However, studying the effect of phosphorylation experimentally has been extremely challenging as there is no viable way of exactly selecting the location and the number of phosphorylated sites. For this reason, researchers have turned to pseudophosphorylation. In this technique, actual phosphorylation is mimicked by mutating the selected amino acid into glutamate or aspartate. Whether this methodology is equivalent to actual phosphorylation is still open to debate. In this study, we will show that phosphorylation and pseudophosphorylation are not exactly equivalent. Although for larger aggregates the two techniques lead to similar structures, the kinetics of the process may be altered. In addition, very little is known about the impact that this may have on the early stages of aggregation, such as nucleation and conformational rearrangement. In this study, we show that the two methods may produce a similar ensemble of conformations, even though the kinetic and chemical details that lead to it are quite different. (Figure Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015948743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015948743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b00194
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b00194
M3 - Article
C2 - 28218850
AN - SCOPUS:85015948743
VL - 121
SP - 2095
EP - 2103
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
SN - 1520-6106
IS - 9
ER -