TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of topiramate migraine prophylaxis on workplace productivity
T2 - Results from two US randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials
AU - Lofland, Jennifer H.
AU - Gagne, Joshua J.
AU - Pizzi, Laura T.
AU - Rupnow, Marcia
AU - Silberstein, Stephen D.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2007/3
Y1 - 2007/3
N2 - OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to determine whether topiramate at 100 mg/d for the treatment of migraine headache is associated with improved productivity in the workplace. METHODS: Results were derived from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials among migraineurs. The number of hours of absenteeism (A), presenteeism (P), and total lost productivity (TLP) (A + P) were calculated. Results were not adjusted for multiplicity. RESULTS: A total of 325 (162 in the topiramate group and 163 in the placebo group) of 449 subjects were included. Per person mean monthly A rate was only significantly less for individuals within the topiramate group (1.0 hours per person) versus those in the placebo group (1.5 hours per person) for month 3 (P < 0.05). Per person mean P and TLP rates were significantly lower for individuals in the topiramate group versus those in the placebo group for months 1 through 5 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that topiramate, compared with placebo, is associated with decreased workplace presenteeism and TLP.
AB - OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to determine whether topiramate at 100 mg/d for the treatment of migraine headache is associated with improved productivity in the workplace. METHODS: Results were derived from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials among migraineurs. The number of hours of absenteeism (A), presenteeism (P), and total lost productivity (TLP) (A + P) were calculated. Results were not adjusted for multiplicity. RESULTS: A total of 325 (162 in the topiramate group and 163 in the placebo group) of 449 subjects were included. Per person mean monthly A rate was only significantly less for individuals within the topiramate group (1.0 hours per person) versus those in the placebo group (1.5 hours per person) for month 3 (P < 0.05). Per person mean P and TLP rates were significantly lower for individuals in the topiramate group versus those in the placebo group for months 1 through 5 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that topiramate, compared with placebo, is associated with decreased workplace presenteeism and TLP.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947109809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947109809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3180322134
DO - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3180322134
M3 - Article
C2 - 17351510
AN - SCOPUS:33947109809
VL - 49
SP - 252
EP - 257
JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
SN - 1076-2752
IS - 3
ER -