@article{42cc47b6a50b443dbadf389ac2b02037,
title = "Implicit self-criminal cognition and its relation to criminal behavior",
abstract = "Three studies adopted implicit social cognition theory and methodology to understand criminal cognition outside of conscious awareness or control, specifically by testing whether individual differences in implicit associations between the self and the group criminals are related to criminal behavior. A Single Category Implicit Association Test measured self-criminal associations across 3 adult samples-2 from Newark, New Jersey, a high-crime United States city, and an adult national sample from the United States. Then, all participants reported their criminal behavior in 2 cross-sectional design studies and 1 longitudinal design study. Consistent with an additive model of implicit and explicit cognition, studies generally demonstrated that strong implicit self-criminal associations increased the odds of committing a criminal act, even after accounting for explicit self-criminal cognition, past criminal behavior, and/or criminal-related demographics. This research suggests that implicit self-criminal associations serve as a cognitive marker for criminal behavior. Furthermore, the present research calls into question criminal justice policies and practices that assume that criminal behavior is exclusively driven by criminal intent.",
keywords = "Criminal identity, Criminal justice system, Implicit social cognition",
author = "Rivera, {Luis M.} and Veyseys, {Bonita M.}",
note = "Funding Information: This research was partially supported by the Rutgers School of Criminal Justice and the Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences-Newark. We are grateful to the RISC Lab for their thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this article, Rima Majmundar, Rebecca Manubag, Katherine Morales, and Michele Terreri for their assistance with data collection, and Ethan Motschmann, Lisa Panila, and Velee Patel for their support with computer programming and data collection supervision. Materials and data can be retrieved from https://osf.io/ 856cs/. Funding Information: This research was partially supported by the Rutgers School of Criminal Justice and the Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences-Newark. We are grateful to the RISC Lab for their thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this article, Rima Majmundar, Rebecca Manubag, Katherine Morales, and Michele Terreri for their assistance with data collection, and Ethan Motschmann, Lisa Panila, and Velee Patel for their support with computer programming and data collection supervision. Materials and data can be retrieved from https://osf.io/ 856cs/. The data are available at http://re3data.org/ The experiment materials are available at http://re3data.org/ Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Luis M. Rivera, Department of Psychology, Rutgers University—Newark, Smith Hall 327, 101 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07102. E-mail: luis@psychology .rutgers.edu Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 American Psychological Association.",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1037/lhb0000300",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "507--519",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",
}