Improving high-stakes decisions via formative assessment, professional development, and comprehensive educator evaluation: The school system improvement project

Todd A. Glover, Linda A. Reddy, Ryan J. Kettler, Alexander Kurz, Adam J. Lekwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accountability movement and high-stakes testing fail to attend to ongoing instructional improvements based on the regular assessment of student skills and teacher practices. Summative achievement data used for high-stakes accountability decisions are collected too late in the school year to inform instruction. This is especially problematic for students who require early intervention to remediate skill-specific difficulties, such as those identified for special education. The purpose of this article is to describe the School System Improvement Project's hybrid approach to utilizing both formative and summative assessments to (a) inform decisions about effective instruction based on all students' and teachers' needs, and (b) guide high-stakes decisions about teacher effectiveness. Five key components of the SSI Project are outlined, including: (a) the use of formative assessments; (b) data collection from multiple teacher and student measures; (c) an emphasis on instruction and service delivery for all students, including those with disabilities, from minority groups, or from marginalized populations, based on a continuum of need; (d) ongoing teacher and administrator support via a systematic problem-solving process and coaching; and (e) consideration of student growth or progress. The practical implications of this approach are provided along with recommendations for advancing research and policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalTeachers College Record
Volume118
Issue number14
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

school system
educator
evaluation
teacher
student
instruction
responsibility
coaching
special education
disability
minority
school
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{78cdc84985ff4c7ea5c9afc364769562,
title = "Improving high-stakes decisions via formative assessment, professional development, and comprehensive educator evaluation: The school system improvement project",
abstract = "The accountability movement and high-stakes testing fail to attend to ongoing instructional improvements based on the regular assessment of student skills and teacher practices. Summative achievement data used for high-stakes accountability decisions are collected too late in the school year to inform instruction. This is especially problematic for students who require early intervention to remediate skill-specific difficulties, such as those identified for special education. The purpose of this article is to describe the School System Improvement Project's hybrid approach to utilizing both formative and summative assessments to (a) inform decisions about effective instruction based on all students' and teachers' needs, and (b) guide high-stakes decisions about teacher effectiveness. Five key components of the SSI Project are outlined, including: (a) the use of formative assessments; (b) data collection from multiple teacher and student measures; (c) an emphasis on instruction and service delivery for all students, including those with disabilities, from minority groups, or from marginalized populations, based on a continuum of need; (d) ongoing teacher and administrator support via a systematic problem-solving process and coaching; and (e) consideration of student growth or progress. The practical implications of this approach are provided along with recommendations for advancing research and policy.",
author = "Glover, {Todd A.} and Reddy, {Linda A.} and Kettler, {Ryan J.} and Alexander Kurz and Lekwa, {Adam J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Teachers College Record",
issn = "0161-4681",
publisher = "Teachers College Record",
number = "14",

}

Improving high-stakes decisions via formative assessment, professional development, and comprehensive educator evaluation : The school system improvement project. / Glover, Todd A.; Reddy, Linda A.; Kettler, Ryan J.; Kurz, Alexander; Lekwa, Adam J.

In: Teachers College Record, Vol. 118, No. 14, 01.01.2016, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving high-stakes decisions via formative assessment, professional development, and comprehensive educator evaluation

T2 - The school system improvement project

AU - Glover, Todd A.

AU - Reddy, Linda A.

AU - Kettler, Ryan J.

AU - Kurz, Alexander

AU - Lekwa, Adam J.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The accountability movement and high-stakes testing fail to attend to ongoing instructional improvements based on the regular assessment of student skills and teacher practices. Summative achievement data used for high-stakes accountability decisions are collected too late in the school year to inform instruction. This is especially problematic for students who require early intervention to remediate skill-specific difficulties, such as those identified for special education. The purpose of this article is to describe the School System Improvement Project's hybrid approach to utilizing both formative and summative assessments to (a) inform decisions about effective instruction based on all students' and teachers' needs, and (b) guide high-stakes decisions about teacher effectiveness. Five key components of the SSI Project are outlined, including: (a) the use of formative assessments; (b) data collection from multiple teacher and student measures; (c) an emphasis on instruction and service delivery for all students, including those with disabilities, from minority groups, or from marginalized populations, based on a continuum of need; (d) ongoing teacher and administrator support via a systematic problem-solving process and coaching; and (e) consideration of student growth or progress. The practical implications of this approach are provided along with recommendations for advancing research and policy.

AB - The accountability movement and high-stakes testing fail to attend to ongoing instructional improvements based on the regular assessment of student skills and teacher practices. Summative achievement data used for high-stakes accountability decisions are collected too late in the school year to inform instruction. This is especially problematic for students who require early intervention to remediate skill-specific difficulties, such as those identified for special education. The purpose of this article is to describe the School System Improvement Project's hybrid approach to utilizing both formative and summative assessments to (a) inform decisions about effective instruction based on all students' and teachers' needs, and (b) guide high-stakes decisions about teacher effectiveness. Five key components of the SSI Project are outlined, including: (a) the use of formative assessments; (b) data collection from multiple teacher and student measures; (c) an emphasis on instruction and service delivery for all students, including those with disabilities, from minority groups, or from marginalized populations, based on a continuum of need; (d) ongoing teacher and administrator support via a systematic problem-solving process and coaching; and (e) consideration of student growth or progress. The practical implications of this approach are provided along with recommendations for advancing research and policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009288104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009288104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009288104

VL - 118

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Teachers College Record

JF - Teachers College Record

SN - 0161-4681

IS - 14

ER -